Artemis Fowl
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2004
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Michigan
Fees and liability.
She probably deserved a son who is not mentally deranged, but life ain't fair sometimes.
Since it is like public knowledge, you can like find it for yourself.Post the mission statement for your company. That’s like public knowledge. Post it.
Desktops have always been around, but when was the split inspection/appraisal ever a common practice? Further, when doing a desktop the user has a reasonable expectation that this is something LESS than a more complete appraisal would show. BUT the bifurcated appraisal is being touted as a duplicate to the far more thorough report that an appraiser is going to do with their own inspection. It is pretty obvious the user (lender) is very likely to think this the equivalent to at least a 2055 and all for half the cost of an ordinary desktop report. Really?this process is not nearly as new as some appraisers believe
The fact appraisers make mistakes is no reason to use the village idiot aka a Realtor to do the inspection where the inspection is probably far more likely to be flawed.addressing some grievous mistake that an appraiser made during the inspection process
Just as importantly it depends upon the available data and the inspection...a flawed inspection makes the best appraisal based on it a moot point.That depends on the appraiser
You looked up Fud not FUD. Again, google FUD.
And again, the article is spreading FUD:
noun
noun: FUD; plural noun: FUDs
- fear, uncertainty and doubt, usually evoked intentionally in order to put a competitor at a disadvantage.
IMO it is intentional and for the very reason the definition mentions
The report was completed from the appraiser's desk, did not value
the site
The AMC are equally concerned with the fee.
Why is 1 party allowed to be concerned with how much money they make, but the other party needs to be the ones that "adapt" and learn to live on less?
Nobody is arguing that appraisers should not be concerned with fees. However, some people are making the point that the arguments that hybrids are not USPAP complaint or are that they are too risky for their intended use are really thinly disguised fee arguments which fool nobody.The AMC are equally concerned with the fee.
Why is 1 party allowed to be concerned with how much money they make, but the other party needs to be the ones that "adapt" and learn to live on less?