• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

I am a machine, or soon to be.

Status
Not open for further replies.

appraisaladam

Freshman Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Professional Status
Certified Residential Appraiser
State
Wisconsin
Beginning in Q4/2023, these phrases and words, if found in a report submitted to the UCDP portal, will result in a fatal message that must be cleared. These messages will be delivered on appraisals containing the most commonly used prohibited, subjective or potentially biased words and phrases.
Words and phrases identified by FHLMC include:

  • Desirable/Undesirable
  • Safe
  • Well Kept
  • Prestigious
  • Students
  • Gentrification
  • Criminal/Crime
Sections 1-3, below, are the updated/new sections of the Unacceptable Appraisal Practices.
The following are examples of unacceptable appraisal practices. Evidence of any of the practices listed in this section will be a breach of Seller’s warranty as to the professional quality of the appraisal.

  1. Consideration of the race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, marital status, disability, familial status, exercise of any federally protected civil right, receipt of income derived from any public assistance program, birthplaces of residents at the property or in the neighborhood, national origin of the prospective owners or occupants of the subject property or of the present owners or occupants of the properties in the vicinity of the subject property. (See also Section 1301.2 for equal opportunity compliance requirements.)
  2. Use of unsupported or subjective terms to assess or rate, such as, but not limited to, “high,” “low,” “good,” “bad,” “fair,” “poor,” “strong,” “weak,” “rapid,” “slow,” “fast” or “average” without providing a foundation for analysis and contextual information
  3. Incorporating terminology or veiled language that may be code words that could indicate underlying bias that include, but are not limited to, “pride of ownership,” “crime-ridden area,” “desirable neighborhood or location” or “undesirable neighborhood or location,” “gentrified,” “preferred community,” “up and coming,” predominantly Hispanic or Black neighborhood, substantial amount of Black or Hispanic residents at the property, diverse school system, amenities specifically geared to a race, ethnic or religious group or using terms such as Millennials, Generation X or Baby Boomers
  4. Inclusion of inaccurate or incomplete data about the subject property, the neighborhood or any comparable sale used in the appraisal analysis
  5. Failure to report and/or consider any apparent factor that has an adverse effect on the value and/or marketability of the subject property
  6. Consideration of the age or location of a dwelling or the age of the neighborhood or census tract where the dwelling is located in a manner that has a discriminatory effect
  7. Reliance in the appraisal analysis on comparable sales that were not personally inspected by the appraiser. A personal inspection requires at least a visual inspection of the exterior of the comparable property.
  8. Reliance in any appraisal analysis on inappropriate comparable sales, or the failure to use comparable sales that are more similar to or nearer to the subject property without adequate explanation
  9. Use of comparable sales data provided by interested parties to the transaction without verification by a disinterested party
  10. The use of inordinate adjustments for differences between the subject property and the comparable sales that do not reflect the market’s reaction to such differences, or the failure to make proper adjustments when they are clearly necessary
  11. Development of value and/or marketability conclusions that are not supported by available market data
  12. The appraiser’s or supervisory appraiser’s breach of a certification or Statement of Assumptions and Limiting Conditions or comparable statements as found on any Freddie Mac approved appraisal report form or addendum.
 
It would be nice if they could tell us what we can or should say to convey conditions in a given neighborhood rather than what they prohibit. How are you supposed to describe negative conditions? 'Minimally appointed bungalow displays extensive deferred maintenance and is typical for the housing stock in the neighborhood? Can you say typical because typical is synoymous with 'average'?
 
I'm thinking its about time to add a paragraph to the addendum and a workfile what an appraisal is, that it is an opinion of value primarily concerned with comparable selection and estimating the subject's value, and not primarily interested in being a sanitized explanation of the neighborhood or a cultivated description of the subject's condition. I will sleep better.
 
They are focused on flavor of the month societal issues and we are focused on housing stock. We don't appraise people, we appraise homes.
 
It's a trap....
 
Meanwhile in what the buyer assumes is a Desirable and Safe neighborhood without any Crime...

1689656767434.png


Too bad that we weren't able to inform the buyers about all those racist facts.
 

Hard to believe but there are still racist police in Bay Area.
Antioch has problems with police racial profiling and now we find racial name calling on the police chief. The current mayor in Antioch is Black and he's not happy.
Decades ago I appraised Antioch, a suburb of affordable homes. Over the years more Blacks have moved in like from Oakland.
I haven't appraised a property in Antioch in over 15 years so I don't know what has happened since then.

Looks like the higher forces are proactive and making sure appraisers don't get racist in their reports.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top