No, that wasn't me, must have been somebody else -though it is possible I mentioned it in one of my posts it is not my primary concern,Lenders do things to save money, too. Starting with outsourcing a certain portion of the loan origination function and all/most of the appraisal function. Cheaper to pay a fee appraiser more when there's business than to carry an employee when there isn't enough business coming in to cover the carrying costs.
As for the borrowers, weren't you the one who was just fretting the prospect of how the borrowers would react if they "knew" who is getting paid what? How about you form an opinion and stick to it on a consistent basis?
And disclose it separately on truth in lending disclosures. That is where competition would get cut throat between amcccccsNo, that wasn't me, must have been somebody else -though it is possible I mentioned it in one of my posts it is not my primary concern,
I have been very consistent in my opinion- - the lender should pay a cost to the AMC for the AMC service which benefits the lender. That simple.
Dead on.Keep on screaming about AMCs and the bundled fee. Might want to consider the impact this type of approach is going to have. They are already cutting deals with AMCs for volume
Home - RSDS Appraisal Diversity
RSDS Appraisal Diversity was created to help solve a 30+ year problem in the appraisal profession: barriers to entry. The current system has created a laborrsdsllc.com
When you water down the barrier to entry.....and produce a oversupply of appraisers that use to make $14 hr at walmart, $150 per appraisal looks good.It’s not the first time national appraisal mills have tried. They’ve always failed in the past. No one‘s addressing the core issue, it’s hard to find a certified appraiser willing to work for $150 an appraisal