<span style='color:brown'>What astounds me is that we are in the business of communicating and here we are debating the validity of grammar, spelling, and sentence structure as though these are optional. Having done numerous reviews I have always assumed that if the writer is incoherent and/or sloppy in their writing, that their analysis will be equally sloppy, and I look for errors and flawed analysis. This assumption may be totally erroneous, but having to read through some of these reports and then try to figure out what the writer is trying to say is absurd.
The art of appraising occurs in two concurrent areas. the first is the ability to arrive at a reasonably accurate value for the purposes stated in the appraisal order, and the second is communicating that value in a meaningful fashion to the client. The USPAP is built around two principles: The first is ethics, and the second is communication. Both are essential. Neither should be ignored. Failure to abide by both principles can lead to financial disaster for the client. At what point does either become irrelevant?
One of my favorite stories concerns the elderly gentleman and the elderly lady who, after several months of sharing the activities in their Sun City condo with each other, are discussing the possibility of marriage. He explains his financial situation. She describes hers. Both like the others situation so he asks her, "Ruth, then it's settled? We will get married?" At which time she thinks, and then says to him "One thing we haven't discussed. What about sex." He, after thinking a moment replies "Infrequently." To which she responds "Is that one word or two?"
The point being, when you communicate the value of an asset in ANY report format, or you explain the basis for that value assumption, or you describe conditions, assumptions, datum, or anything else relevant to the decision making process being used by the client, you had better be accurate.....both in your assumptions, and in your communication.
Perhaps a forum such as this is not the place to emphasize articulateness, but when is it acceptable to mis-communicate? At what point does sloppiness in everyday or casual life merge with sloppiness in your (so called) professional life? In my opinion, considering our job is to communicate, accuracy is mandatory. Fragmented and incomplete sentences indicate fragmented and incomplete thoughts. If you don't know what your are saying, why should I bother to try to decipher it? This applies to the reports we write and to the discussions we have. If you can't bother writing it properly, why should anyone bother to read it?</span>