It is somewhat typical to measure to the 1/10' or to the inch. So that benchmark makes sense to most.Arbitrary. Why not 0.05 or 0.2? Details of a game set my Fannie.
That makes sense.Assessor probably used the submitted blueprints from building permit. Contractor changed the footprint but still same GLA.
I never ever measured to the 1/10 inch before ANZI forced it upon us. No need to be that accurate. Let appraisers worry about more important things.It is somewhat typical to measure to the 1/10' or to the inch. So that benchmark makes sense to most.
I have to give credit to BRCJR on this one.Assessor probably used the submitted blueprints from building permit. Contractor changed the footprint but still same GLA.
I don't measure to the 1/10 inch with ANSI. What a rubeI never ever measured to the 1/10 inch before ANZI forced it upon us. No need to be that accurate. Let appraisers worry about more important things.
Usually... County Assessors don't pull a tape around the dwelling.Yeah, really don't know how they made that mistake this was an add on and clearly joined the porch
View attachment 94332
Ours do. In fact, are required to by law in Arkansas.Usually... County Assessors don't pull a tape around the dwelling.
The original house was built by the Cherokee Nation. Those were simple 2 or 3 bed, 1 bath houses, slab with a 1 car garage. This house originally was built possibly in the early 60s to mid-70s. The Nation then allowed the (tribal member) property to be sold. The buyers remodeled the house by adding to one end, enclosed the carport and made it a kitchen then added the family room about 8 years ago. This is pretty common in those 900- 1200 SF "Indian homes" which blanket much of the Cherokee Nation (which is about 4 counties large.)Terrible floor plan