Ok, I see the angle now, Glenn.
There is no USPAP in this case the State Licensing Board has not reviewed the appraisals nor charged the appraisers with any USPAP violations. The Judge is on a witch hunt and is wasting her timeUSPAP yields to the law, rule or regulation. If state law includes laws which empower the judge to issue a court order then that's all it takes. We don't get to tell a judge "no" just because we're appraisers.
The Judge has never invoked any USPAP charges as the State has never paid to have any other outside appraisals completed. In Summary its not a case about USPAP or where it even matters. Its a criminal trial not a real estate trial.In short, JE rule requires appraisers to yield to the court. (not that courts have to yield to USPAP)
So? Ronald Reagan was also a Democrat before he was a Republican and HIllary Clinton was a Republican before she was as Democrat. That means nothing.I’m not very partisan .. I just see with my eyes and watch events.
If Trump were a democrat … he would be widely lauded as the greatest President since FDR and his wife the most beautiful First Lady in history.
He is absolutely a generational phenomenon.
There is no denying it and anybody who does is either an idiot or a liar.
As I read it the appraisers are claiming confidentality. They're trying to city USPAP as a defense for violating a court order, setting USPAP against the law. If so, they can't do that. If they're arguing confidentiality on a contractual basis there will be legal precedents preventing that, too.There is no USPAP in this case the State Licensing Board has not reviewed the appraisals nor charged the appraisers with any USPAP violations. The Judge is on a witch hunt and is wasting her time![]()
Wed May -11 2022The appraisers are claiming confidentality. They're trying to city USPAP as a defense for violating a court order.
I haven't looked into it but there has to be some appeal process. Otherwise vindictive prosecutors can just tell you to turn over 40 years of appraisals and their workfiles. 6 years of reports is different than wanting the reports in question. It is a fishing expedition.USPAP Doesn’t apply? How’s that?
I’m just trying to understand here, not to be flippant.
If you’re an appraiser in the state of New York, you follow USPAP like Everybody else. At least that’s what I thought.
If a judge orders you to produce papers, there’s no getting around the jurisdictional exception clause of USPAP. At least that’s what I thought.
C&W’s appeal seems to defy that.
Right the issue is that its a fishing expedition, they are not fighting the subpoenas for Trump related appraisals.Wed May -11 2022
- Commercial real estate services giant Cushman & Wakefield appealed a judge’s order that it comply with subpoenas issued by the New York attorney general’s office seeking documents related to its appraisals of properties owned by former President Donald Trump’s company.
- Cushman & Wakefield argued that complying with the subpoena for tens of thousands of pages of documents would compromise the confidential information of nearly 1,000 of its clients who have no connection to the Trump Organization.
- New York Attorney General Letitia James is investigating how the Trump Organization valued certain real estate assets.