5/3? They pay a respectable fee of $400 per order. 5/3 sets the fee, not the appraiser!!
Another regional bank I work for pays $450 per appraisal. No AMC. I do not set the fee they do!!
A local bank that uses a AMC's software program only pays a fee of $400. Again, the bank sets the fee and not the appraiser!!!
Another national lender that uses AP pays $450 per appraisal...they set the fee and not the appraiser!!
See where I am going with this?...
Yeah, I see where you are going, and I totally disagree.
If, as you state, the
lender is in control of the fee, then why is the average appraisal fee for a basic 1004 in the Portland market currently north of $800? If the lender/AMC is in control of fees, then why are they choosing to pay such rates? Do they just love (and "respect") appraisers in Portland more than they love (and "respect") appraisers in your area? No. The answer is that the appraisers in Portland have, as a group, pushed the fees to their current levels. And, when the volume in Portland drops off, it will be the appraisers who will, due to competitive market forces, push fees back to lower levels.
Is your view two-way street? There are PLENTY of appraisers in Portland (and Seattle, Denver, etc.) right now who are grossing over $250,000, or more. Are they "disrespecting" their clients by charging that much, or are they just reacting to current market conditions?
I have had this discussion with appraisers in my own market for over 20 years. I don't understand why appraisers have so much trouble with the simple concept that it is the appraisers who set the fees for appraisal services. All a lender, AMC, or any potential client can do is
offer to pay a certain price. It is up to the appraiser to either accept that price, or not. I was a partner/owner in a firm for over 20 years, and I had a lot of potential clients who wanted to pay fees that were less than what I charged, but they had no power whatsoever to make me accept what they were offering.
When I talk to appraisers in Nashville, many still make comments along the line of, "Man, we really hate that you sold your firm - you really kept the fees up in the area." My fee was relatively high, and others would often cite my fee as a basis for their own fees. When I sold my firm they still had the ability to charge whatever they wanted, but many just didn't have the nerve to set the fee high and keep it there. They would just panic at the first sign of market change and reduce fees. That, in my view, is the biggest challenge appraisers face with fees. It is not the clients who drive fees down, it is the appraisers who are willing to produce similar quality at a lower fee. I personally fought that battle for a long time.
I had to have a dental implant last year. The oral surgeon I have been to before quoted me a price to perform that procedure. Being a researcher of market data, I looked around. I discovered another doctor who had just as good a reputation who examined my scans and quoted a price that was $1,000 less than the first guy. Guess who I chose to do my procedure. Was that disrespectful to the guy I had used before? What motivation would I (or anyone) have to pay more for the same result?