Okay, then are you saying that its okay to use a comp with an increased value of $6000 of a upgraded item shouldn't be adjusted for and used to justify and increase in base price for a subject property?
That would defiantly be an issue if we were appraising a value with an effective date being 5 years into the future.Do you think anyone is going to recognize those "upgrades" when the property sells 5 years later? That's the issue.
If we are required on new home to complete the following " the appraisal must include discussion and analysis of sales concessions and upgrades for the subject property relative to concessions and upgrades for each builder sale" - how does an appraiser justify not making adjustments for upgrades if we are adjusting for the differences against the subject? Because are we not giving those upgrades value from competing comps , by not adjusting for them?
Seriously, I am confused here. If my peers are not adjusting for builder upgrades- I want to understand the reasoning. Especially if we are given a list of builder upgrades, upgrade total amount , how often do we try to extract a value for something by completing paired sales, regression, extraction or some other method- and now we are given a value supported by closed sales or pending sales and don't adjust for is since the future value of these items may be different?
Has anyone seen this article?
http://appraisalnewsonline.typepad.com/appraisal_news_for_real_e/2008/07/adventures-in-r.html
So, if out goal is to make a comparable property as similar in value to the subject property- its better to make a hypothetical adjustment on the estimated future value of the depricated upgrades vs the recent actual buyer paid cost of the upgrades of a closed sale ?
So in the grid if we adjust to make the comps similar to the subject and don't adjust for the upgrades , value is still being given to those upgrades since the final sales price of the comps and subject reflect those upgrades, correct?
So unless you go line by line with the subject upgrades in comparison with the comps. and extract a market difference for each item, where do you obtain this data, how do you justify. that this data is better than the sales office data for the upgrade cost paid for by the new home buyer?
If making a contributory value , extracted through resales , of depreciated upgrades on resale homes and apply that adjustment to a new home, how is that adjustment better supported than 1-1 adjustment from the upgrade cost?