Hmm were to start, the spin on this as I read via news websites is that E come out looking like just another large appraisal shop doing wrong while the big bank is the victim of the appraisal firm’s wrong doing, which in the end makes us (appraisers in whole) look bad.
As I see it, it is just another day in the appraisal business, lender putting pressure one the shoulders of the appraiser to make value and the appraiser given in so they can get work and feed their family. I mean, come on, just change the names of the people in the suite and you can see any of us in that place. Joeblow Appraisals overvalue properties by give in to mortgage broker demands. Put any spin on it, presure on the AMC via Bank, Appraiser via AMC, Appraiser via Loan Officer, Appriaser via Home Owner, Appriaser via RE Agent, it comes out the same, pressure from the money makers to the appraiser.
The heart of Denis’s post #123 is what we should be pressing for, “Here is the significance as I see it: If this case starts and stops with EappraiseIT, then not much will change. If, however, the federal regulators become involved and review the situation and determine that lenders are not overseeing (due diligence) their third-party vendors appropriately, then a lot will change. And that "lot" will be positive change.”
IMHO, if the federal regulators do not get involved to stop it (pressure) where it is starting from, then is just another day in the appraisal world and nothing will change.