Yesterday there were three different threads asking if such-and-such were in USPAP, and all three thread questions were highly annoying. How does one ask such a question and claim to be a professional in this industry? A typical residential appraiser needs to only be versed in about 30 pages MAX, and one can read some of the pages once and never need to return. Confidentiality, read it once and done. Ethics, read it once and done. Standards 1 and 2 are not that long.
................My office has a policy that a rental agreement must be in the file or the assignment will be turned down due to risk exposure. ................
Risk of what?
Residential appraising and commercial appraising along with agricultural appraising all fall under the directive of one USPAP document. There are not three different documents. Why do you need a lease or rental agreement? What risk is there by not having one vs. having one where the lease is not at market?
What do you do if there are no tenants and therefore there is not lease? You do the same thing as if you DID have a lease, you still determine market rent. I had a farm where the tenants were paying $60/acre and I had the lease. It was highly productive land and the lease was not even close to market; I estimated rent at $200/acre. So in that case the lease had no bearing on the valuation.
Requiring a lease is the same as requiring a purchase price in a sle property; you don't need it to appraise it.
The, "Does USPAP?" questions are becoming more than a little bit disconcerting!
Your words are nicer than mine. The questions are insulting to the profession. When doing a residential assignment I am held to the same standards as a Certified Residential Appraiser and vice versa. Why do these certified people not know the basics of their profession?
I remember a litigation case where the other appraiser cited USPAP rules (not) getting them mixed up with Fannie guidelines which was not applicable in the case. He was applying fannie adjustment guidelines to a litigation case and then citing USPAP as the source of those fannie adjustment guidelines which DID NOT EVEN *&%%&(%^ apply!!!!!!!
This idiot should be just as familiar with USPAP as I am and he couldn't even get Fannie and USPAP separated and in addition was stupid enough to abide by fannie guidelines (calling them USPAP guidelines) in a #$$%^&*() litigation case.
Frustrated is an understatement because people like him make the profession look very bad.
m2: m2: m2: