Joker
Elite Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- Ohio
I would like to get some other appraisers' opinions on this.
:arrow:
If an appraisal report has several errors of ommission and commission that produce misleading results, should the offender be reported to the state regulatory board? I do not want to file a formal complaint, but people like this give our profession a bad name. I just want to generate some discussion.
For example: I recently reviewed an appraisal of commercial property and to begin with, the appraiser stated the present owner wrong. There had been 2 transfers in the past three years that were not addressed. The entity stated as present owner in the report had not owned the property for 3 years. The Sales Comparison Approach was not done, stating that there were no sales but there were 2 in 10 miles in the last year. The Income Capitalization Approach was the only approach relied on and was not supported by market data. Additionally, this approach had an error that inflated the value by 20%. The property has been vacant and for sale for almost a year. The value indicated was "as-is" but was 65% higher than the asking price, with no explantion why. The report was labeled "full commercial narrative report", not complete apppraisal summary report or something similar.
:arrow:
If an appraisal report has several errors of ommission and commission that produce misleading results, should the offender be reported to the state regulatory board? I do not want to file a formal complaint, but people like this give our profession a bad name. I just want to generate some discussion.
For example: I recently reviewed an appraisal of commercial property and to begin with, the appraiser stated the present owner wrong. There had been 2 transfers in the past three years that were not addressed. The entity stated as present owner in the report had not owned the property for 3 years. The Sales Comparison Approach was not done, stating that there were no sales but there were 2 in 10 miles in the last year. The Income Capitalization Approach was the only approach relied on and was not supported by market data. Additionally, this approach had an error that inflated the value by 20%. The property has been vacant and for sale for almost a year. The value indicated was "as-is" but was 65% higher than the asking price, with no explantion why. The report was labeled "full commercial narrative report", not complete apppraisal summary report or something similar.