Some good stuff:
1. "The appraisal process is an art, not a science. Alig v. Quicken Loans Inc., 990 F.3d 782, 803 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating that “home valuation is to some degree an art, not a science; some variability is to be expected”); Midstate Fin. Co. v. Peoples, 587 B.R. 685, 692 (E.D. Tenn. 2018)"
2. "Plaintiffs do not have an appraiser expert to testify that Defendants’ appraisal is unreasonable, does not accurately reflect a reasonable opinion of the market value of Plaintiffs’ home as of June 14, 2021, or that Defendants made errors during the appraisal process. See Ex"
3. “Courts further agree that assessment of fair market value is ‘more art than science.’”); Adler v. Elk Glenn, LLC, 986 F. Supp. 2d 851, 860 (E.D. Kent. 2013) (“Determining the before-and-after value of real estate is an art, not a science."
4. Examining Defendants’ appraisal of Plaintiffs’ home, Plaintiffs’ expert Dr. Howell opinesin several respects that Defendants did not comply with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP)4or his practices in other appraisals. Dr. Howell, because she is not an appraiser and does not have the knowledge, education, or training to be an appraiser, should not be permitted to testify as to whether Defendants complied with USPAP or otherwise should have acted differently or made different decisions when performing the appraisal of Plaintiffs’ home. However, when addressing the specific differences, it becomes clear that Plaintiffs cannot rebut the legitimate nondiscriminatory bases for Defendants’ appraisal..."
I hope the PAVE committee reads the Judge's decision, along with TAF and AI.