ZZGAMAZZ
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- California
-------The best proof is USPAP itself. It has many errors and was, we might assume, written by "smart" appraisers. But then again, maybe the real problem was that they were not smart enough.
On another note, one thing I discovered along my path of experience, is that going back to correct an old appraisal is fraught with danger. It is surprising how a relatively small change to one part of a report can ripple through other parts of the report. A change in the SCA can impact the CA; so any time you make changes to an old report, you really have to sit down and study the dependencies, before making that change. It is very easy, when your focus is on a more current task, to brush off some requested change to a past report as "minor".
1) FHA underwriter issued a stipulation that my Subject To various repairs should warrant a HC to a C4 UAD condition rather than the C3 that I indicated. To do so warranted at least 1 dozen changes throughout the report (though I'm still looking for an educational course that will help me better to understand the role/authority of the Direct Endorsement Underwriter.)
2) USPAP editors might well be appraisers, but they are beaurocrats 1st and infamously-foremost, e.g., creating a distinct set of standards for reporting versus developing.