• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

TAF and USPAP - great analysis


I don't think most appraisers care.

The question none of the critics have an answer for is what comes next after the demise of TAF?
What coda will take the place of USPAP​
How will it be developed​
Who will develop/promulgate it​
How will it gain acceptance and applicability across the nation (in the interests of interstate commerce)​
By what process will it adapt to any changes in the market or at societal or governmentals levels​
How will all this occur on the human-free basis so as to avoid the perils of human frailty​
How will these standards be enforced, and by whom.​
Will that enforcement be limited to the users (only) or will govt get involved as a form of consumer protection​
and...​
How will that alternative not enrage the same critics, on the same basis and for the same reasons, as what already exists.​
Whatever comes next, the critics will hate the new boss just as much as they hate the old boss. They still won't make the effort to understand why each of those requirements exist or how they actually work in furtherance of the appraisers' own legitimate interests, and they will still call anyone who's competent with the material a shill and a bootlicker for the sin of correcting their misinterpretations. They'll still call these requirements vague and inscrutable and claim it's impossible for anyone to comply, ever.

Appraisers can be depended upon to act like....appraisers.

All good questions.. for those that care about it. :)
 
All good questions.. for those that care about it. :)
This is what you said:

"The moment that sticks in my mind is when they began rolling back residential qualifications with the issues at that time being appraisal fees in the pot states."

You cared about what they were doing then, and you even framed your disagreement in terms of the fees rather than in terms of appraiser competency.

Now don't get me wrong, I agree that these actions are of negative effect on appraisal fees and that fee appraisers have reason to strongly oppose reductions in those barriers to entry. But by the same measure, "will flood the market and reduce fees" isn't an argument about competency. It's an argument about fees.
 
Oh. so you are a Bert groupie. Got it. That's all I needed to hear to realize I should ignore your posts.
 
This is what you said:

"The moment that sticks in my mind is when they began rolling back residential qualifications with the issues at that time being appraisal fees in the pot states."

You cared about what they were doing then, and you even framed your disagreement in terms of the fees rather than in terms of appraiser competency.

Now don't get me wrong, I agree that these actions are of negative effect on appraisal fees and that fee appraisers have reason to strongly oppose reductions in those barriers to entry. But by the same measure, "will flood the market and reduce fees" isn't an argument about competency. It's an argument about fees.

That is not correct. My argument for the qualifications staying as it was overall competency across licensees. The reason for rolling back qualifcations was obviously because fees were too high and turn times were too long in the in the pot states.

My point of view regarding the topic is very well documented. As is your point of view. I don't really care to discuss it any further. :)
 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top