TAF and USPAP - great analysis

[Mejappz]

Oh. so you are a Bert groupie. Got it. That's all I needed to hear to realize I should ignore your posts.

That's what I thought. And it’s why I did not respond to you. Go on reveling in your blissful ignorance.

 

[djd09]

since you know so much about me, you can look it up. Use your stellar research skills to scour my political posts

i dont need to look up anything...i already know

 

[djd09]

Check out TAFs IAC partners.

View attachment 88903

might as well let coester join...

 

[Francois K. Gregoire]

i dont need to look up anything...i already know

Such a disappointment after conceding your stellar research skills. Here is the reality: You know bupkis

 

[Mejappz]

might as well let coester join...

I’m sure if he was still in the industry he would have a front-row seat and when he got in trouble he would simply start rattling off bible verses or bring in a celebrity to woo TAF. LOL

 

[djd09]

Such a disappointment after conceding your stellar research skills. Here is the reality: You know bupkis

what...do you think you are any different then all the other little liberal shills

 

[DWiley]

What I'm suggesting is that if two appraisers use the same or similar data, they would typically arrive at similar results. Even if one appraiser rates the property as 'Good condition' and another as 'Average' or 'C3 to C4', the difference in value would be minimal compared to the current practice. It would be literally impossible to have a significant value difference unless one of the appraisers fabricates the data in which case it would be easy to prove. That is simply impossible to do with the current system. Many appraisers are flying by the seat of their pants and literally adjusting for variables that don’t even affect value. while not adjusting for the variables that do.

And all of what you suggests falls into the category of applying the methodology incorrectly; it does not point to a flaw in the methodology itself. Not adjusting for variables that affect value is not consistent with any current methodology that I am aware of. Can you provide a citation to a methodology that promotes that as acceptable?

 

[Mejappz]

And all of what you suggests falls into the category of applying the methodology incorrectly; it does not point to a flaw in the methodology itself. Not adjusting for variables that affect value is not consistent with any current methodology that I am aware of. Can you provide a citation to a methodology that promotes that as acceptable?

Do you seriously believe using paired sales is going to cut it when you’re appraising multi million dollar properties? Maybe in some cookie cutter condo project.

 

[Joe Flacco]

Do you seriously believe using paired sales is going to cut it when you’re appraising multi million dollar properties? Maybe in some cookie cutter condo project.

I don't understand why you insist that regression is best for complex high-value properties. That is one of the most ridiculous claims ever. Best application for regression is cookie cutter properties.

 

[Francois K. Gregoire]

what...do you think you are any different then all the other little liberal shills

thanks for demonstrating your inability to complete even the most basic tasks (cannot call them skills). You know bupkis.