The Appraiser Shortage Myth Part 43

[timd354]

Sorry to make you waste that popcorn. As I indicated earlier, I will not be engaging M on any discussion of regs or laws. It is a waste of time.

It is undoubtedly a complete and utter waste of time, but I did have to engage with her one more time in this thread since she accused Denis and myself of dishonestly posting only half of the applicable law/regulation regarding C&R which was simply not a true accusation and was based on her inability to distinguish between the actual regulations themselves and comments/interpretations of those regulations.

Now that I proved beyond any doubt that neither Denis nor myself failed to post the entire relevant sections of the regulations, I am also done with discussing these types of issues with her also. I know that that post won't affect what Marion thinks, but I don't want others thinking that we only posted half of the regs in an attempt to mislead people

 

[djd09]

My only question is how much do you shills get paid to post all the disinformation?

 

[Pittsburgh Pete]

Since when did "fake information" start being printed in the Federal Register--perhaps sometime this January?

Not surprising that another "dim bulb" liked that post.

 

[djd09]

It is like fishing without bait and still catching the biggest fish. Thanks PP.

 

[Pittsburgh Pete]

It is like fishing without bait and still catching the biggest fish. Thanks PP.

Well after all, you are the worm!

 

[djd09]

Better then a snake.

 

[Terrel L. Shields]

C & R is a joke. It always was and always will be. Mindless piffle added to the law for no obvious reason but obfuscation.

 

[djd09]

C&R is useless without data. They hide the fees like it is "gold".

 

[Meandering]

Marian, you are sadly mistaken about what the actual regulation actually includes, yet you have the audacity to accuse us of being dishonest and posting half of what the law states.

You ignorance on the subject is so utterly profound that you think that you posted the actual regulation when what you posted is the staff interpretation of the regulation/law, not the actual regulation itself. If you had bothered to read the entire text, and not just the snippet that you posted you would realize that what you posted is actually part of Supplement I, which includes the staff interpretations or the regulation but is not the actual regulations itself.

The actual regulations regarding C&R are on page 66582 of Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208, not page 66586 where the "interpretation" is listed. Below is a copy of the actual regulation regarding C & R (which is a part of Reg. Z), all relevant parts of which I had previously provided. By the way, this same regulation is also posted right on the cfpb website, which anyone can check for themsleves here: https://www.consumerfinance.gov/eregulations/1026-42/2013-30108_20150718#1026-42-f

It is more than a little pathetic that you accused Denis and myself of only posting half of the law/regulation when you don't even have the ability to figure out what parts of the federal register are the actual regulation and which are parts are comments and/or interpretations.

View attachment 32929

But you see Tim,

Therein is only 1/2 the truth.

Continue Reading to page 66586 from the exact same reference you cite.

 

[Meandering]

My only question is how much do you shills get paid to post all the disinformation?

A lot, plus benefits.

That's why they fight so hard.

Imagine if they lost their jobs as kool aid dispensers, getting paid to play on the internet all day, and had to actually work for a liviing.


.