These are the Morons Who are Running Climate with Our Government

[Terrel L. Shields]

 

[Essexfenwick]

Bill Gates has finally admitted "climate change" is not a big deal. It took 30 years for him to catch up with me.

Also ... Just to educate ... COVID was not a "pandemic,"
Pro tip... Pandemics don't have open borders with unvaccinated hordes flooding in .

Your welcome.

 

[djd09]

US military accused of secret climate spraying operation dumping 60 million tons of toxic nanoparticles into the skies​

The US military has been accused of spraying toxic chemicals into the air for decades as part of a secret program that has backfired in its goal of stopping global warming.

Dane Wigington, an environmental researcher for 30 years, claimed that the conspiracy surrounding 'chemtrails' is not only true but has actually crippled the Earth's ability to naturally overcome the pollution caused by humans.

The 'chemtrail' conspiracy focuses on the idea that the government has been spraying a host of dangerous chemicals from commercial airliners for several reasons, including to control the weather and make people sick.

The vast majority of scientists and the US government have long declared this theory as false, and most condensation trails, or 'contrails', seen in the sky are the result of water vapor from aircraft exhaust freezing into ice crystals as it hits cold air at high altitudes.

However, Wigington said that lab tests on rain samples, photos of specialized planes carrying these chemicals, government documents, and whistleblower testimony all show clear evidence that a secret program has attempted to weaponize weather.

The researcher claimed that the US military has built a massive weather control program over the last years, with chemical spraying ramping up in the 1990s to block sunlight and cool the planet.

He estimated that airliners equipped with secret nozzles and tanks on their wings, filled with aluminum, barium, manganese, graphene, and various polymers, have dumped between 40 and 60 million tons of nanoparticles in the sky every year.

'These programs are literally disabling the planet's counterbalancing life support systems,' Wigington said on the Tucker Carlson Show.

Wigington claimed that the US military has been the main group spraying chemtrails throughout the world, using their own planes as well as secretly modified commercial jets to hide the operation.

The researcher claimed he has been collecting evidence about this program for 27 years, noting that Congress has even acknowledged the existence of this operation, which allegedly dates back to the 1940s.

A 1978 report titled Weather Modification: Programs, Problems, Policy, and Potential was published by the US Senate Subcommittee on Oceans and International Environment and documented testimonies, research summaries, and policy discussions on US weather-modifying efforts over four decades.

'Ultimately, all roads lead to those who print the money... We have an 800-page US Senate document from 1978 outlining the scope and scale of these programs,' Wigington said during the November 10 podcast.

The original plan of what scientists call geoengineering was to use these particles to control the weather, making it rain, stopping storms, or creating droughts in disputed areas to help in wars or impact local farming.

Another goal was to cool the planet by using these microscopic reflective particles to block out more sunlight, like putting a giant umbrella over the Earth to fight global warming.

However, Wigington explained that his research has proven how this plan has completely backfired, as the particles actually trapped heat closer to the ground instead of letting it escape into space.

His testing of rainwater has discovered detectable amounts of aluminum, barium, and strontium, metals that don’t belong in nature and have poisoned plants from the roots up, killing forests, wiping out insects like bees, and making fish disappear from lakes

A 2016 study surveying 77 atmospheric scientists revealed that 98.7 percent said there was no evidence of a secret large-scale atmospheric spraying program, with the only scientist who disagreed attributing contrails to natural phenomena.

Despite the widespread pushback against this theory, major tech entrepreneurs have been publicly investing in smaller-scale operations that have been pumping unlight-reflecting aerosols into Earth's stratosphere.

In 2021, a roughly $3 million mission backed by Microsoft founder Bill Gates tested a system that sent a large balloon filled with more than four pounds of chalk dust into the stratosphere.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) also publicly announces when 'weather modification' activities are taking place near certain airports throughout the US.

However, skepticism about these activities has been growing, with the current Secretary for Health and Human Services (HHS), Robert F Kennedy Jr, even publicly supporting investigations into the alleged widespread spraying of toxins into the air.

'Those materials are put in jet fuel,' RFK Jr claimed in April. 'I'm going to do everything in my power to stop it. Find out who's doing it and holding them accountable.'

dont you believe your own eyes...

 

[Terrel L. Shields]

COP 30 - which ripped up thousands of trees to build roads and built a venue for the big environmental conference - well now it has had a big fire.

 

[Terrel L. Shields]

 

[Dublin ohio]

COP 30 - which ripped up thousands of trees to build roads and built a venue for the big environmental conference - well now it has had a big fire.

The Newsom effect

 

[djd09]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1997456321264898198

 

[Terrel L. Shields]

 

[Charles West]

Another booboo by the climate alarmists and a scathing criticism of the once venerated publication Nature.

A Climate Study Retraction for the Ages​

A much-hyped study in the journal Nature turns out to have been full of errors.​

---

By

The Editorial Board

Dec. 9, 2025, 5:52 pm ET

Sebastian Kahnert/Zuma Press

One scandal of our age is the attempt to sell the public on the narrative of climate catastrophe. It’s been fed by the press and overheated political and scientific claims that sometimes are phony. That’s the story with the journal Nature’s retraction of a highly publicized climate study that made headlines.

The study was a shocker when it was first published in April 2024. Scientists at Germany’s Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research projected that climate change could cause $38 trillion in economic damage a year by 2049. To put that number in perspective, the GDP of North America last year was about $31.4 trillion. The study’s finding would mean that storms, heat waves and other calamities, supposedly caused by climate change, would wipe out the equivalent of the North American economy, and then some, every year.



The study also forecast that rising CO2 emissions would cause a 62% reduction in global GDP by 2100, and that damage over the next quarter of a century would exceed the costs of mitigating global warming by six times.

Progressives hyped the study to argue that government interventions like electric-vehicle mandates are worth the cost. The study “shines a new light on the patterns and severity of climate change’s economic impacts while bolstering key conclusions from other research,” reported Axios, a leading promoter of the climate-scare narrative.

Yet not long after the study was published, other scientists flagged problems with its methodology and errors in its data. In July 2024, Nature issued a correction noting that rows of data were “wrongly printed as a decimal, rather than a percentage point.”

Other scientists wrote in a comment to Nature—akin to a newspaper letter to the editor—that the study “underestimates uncertainty . . . rendering their results statistically insignificant when properly corrected.”

Still other scientists in August noted in a comment that “data anomalies arising from one country” in the “underlying GDP dataset, Uzbekistan, substantially bias their predicted impacts of climate change.” When the Uzbekistan data was removed and statistical uncertainty corrected for, the results were no longer “statistically distinguishable from mitigation costs at any time this century.”

In other words, the economic harm from climate change no longer exceeded the costs of the government interventions to do something to arrest warming temperatures.

The study had so many errors that Nature has now retracted it, but what an embarrassment. “Post-publication, the results were found to be sensitive to the removal of one country, Uzbekistan, where inaccuracies were noted in the underlying economic data for the period 1995–1999,” the retraction says.

The retraction is also a black eye for the Network for Greening the Financial System, a group of central banks and financial regulators that incorporated the study’s projections into its bank climate stress test scenarios. The Federal Reserve belonged to the network until Chair Jerome Powell withdrew in January.

One question is why the study’s glaring errors weren’t caught by peer reviewers before it was published. One culprit might be conformity bias, as reviewers didn’t want to gainsay findings that support the narrative that humanity is killing the planet and the entire world economy must be rearranged to prevent it. When politics is in the saddle, the chances of bad science increase.

If progressives want to know why so many Americans don’t believe claims of the climate apocalypse, it’s because so much of climate science has been shown to be unbelievable.

---

 

[DTB]

DeKalb, IL, we've had around 15" of snow in the past 2 weeks

OOPSIE


I wonder if they would have held up, how much juice they were generating when covered in snow? Maroons, the whole lot of them!!