Don Clark
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Virginia
Don,
I am sure that if you filed a complaint, it must have been warranted. The issue of neighborhood boundaries does seem a bit grey to me and can be a matter of opinion.
I say the neighborhood extends to 58th St E and you say it only extends to 50th St E.
In many of the areas that I work, the neighborhood boundries are very clear. Many are not. I assume that the complaint that you filed was a neighborhood with very defined boundaries?
I agree. If it had just been the neighborhood boundaries I would not have filed a complaint. For the record, TAF changed USPAP in 1996 and removed "Neighborhood" in favor of market area. i do appraisals in many neighborhoods that if you described only the neighborhood you would be left with no sales, and a false impression of the subjects market. When I do a report, if the subjects market area is larger than a neighborhood I use the boundaries of the market area, state that in the description of the boundaries, and several other places throughout the report so that the report is not misleading, and that there is a clear description of the subjects market area, a term found in USPAP whereas neighborhood is not. Hell, in 2 counties in North Carolina where I do appraisals, in many cases there is no neighborhood and the entire county is the market area. Maybe one day the secondary market will mature enough to recognize that.