Virgina REAB and Portal Petition

[Ken B]

tick...tock...tick...tock...tick

:new_popcornsmiley::new_all_coholic:

 

[George W Dodd]

"Lowest requirements" does not mean the same thing as "minimum requirements".

Minimum (English U.S.)
- Smallest amount
- Least amount
- Lowest amount
- Bare minimum
- Least
- Lowest possible

 

[George W Dodd]

What, no response from Mr. Santora?

 

[George Hatch]

The lowest standard for being able to fly a plane is demonstrated by whether I can get it off the ground. The minimum standards for flying a plane in the U.S. are quite a bit higher than that.

In addition, the minimum standards for an appraisal will vary according to the use/user and several other factors. What's minimally acceptable under USPAP for one use can and will be quite insufficient for others.

 

[Rich Heyn]

Contest:

I've found several likely USPAP violations on the example appraisal submitted by Mr. Wiley. I'll give you one to get started: Sale No. 3 adjustment for financial concessions. The report does not state what those concessions were, how it impacted the sales price, nor how the adjustment was developed. Kind of misleading isn't it.

Can anybody find the others? Should these errors be addressed at the VA Board Meeting? It certainly speaks to the credibility issue of "I was the chairman of ASB and I know everything about USPAP" argument. Should the report be sent to TN Appraisal Board and/or the professional organizations?

Or can the claim be made it was only for educational purposes and an appraisal report doesn't need to be USPAP compliant when it's just made up, even though its been submitted to a State Appraisal Board?

A sample report created for demonstration purposes needs to be USPAP compliant? Interesting.

 

[Ken B]

A sample report created for demonstration purposes needs to be USPAP compliant? Interesting.

Somebody needs to tell the ice cream company.

 

[George W Dodd]

A sample report created for demonstration purposes needs to be USPAP compliant? Interesting.

Are you suggesting that the self-proclaimed USPAP expert is exempt for producing a USPAP compliant report to be used in that USPAP expert's argument that AIReady is USPAP compliant when there appears to be violations of USPAP in the sample report is not relevant?


This goes directly to credibility.

 

[George W Dodd]

Mr. Brown,

Aren't you late to polish Mr. Wiley's shoes? It's amazing that somebody with so little relevant information has in excess of 2,133 posts.

 

[Rich Heyn]

Are you suggesting that the self-proclaimed USPAP expert is exempt for producing a USPAP compliant report to be used in that USPAP expert's argument that AIReady is USPAP compliant when there appears to be violations of USPAP in the sample report is not relevant?


This goes directly to credibility.

George,
Did you notice this comment at the top of page three of Danny's sample report?
"This is a sample report prepared for demonstration purposes. All data presented is fictional."

Also, please take this as friendly advice that statements like "self-proclaimed USPAP expert" might be considered overly sarcastic and in violation of forum rules. I've found this thread very interesting and informative and it would be unfortunate if it were locked due to what some might feel are ad hominem, off-topic posts.

 

[Ken B]

tick...tock...tick...tock...tick

:new_popcornsmiley::new_all_coholic: