Cob
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2006
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Texas
I don't get it. It was not about "value". Like a homeowner filing a complaint because they did not "like" the value. It was about not supporting or explaining something that any appraiser I know would have done without thinking. Appraising a property above list when it has been on the market for multiple months with no explanation. A 38% change in value due to ROV and no explanation. Seriously
You are 100% CORRECT that it "was about not supporting or explaining something" but some of it was about value as well, 38% increase in valuation between his original report and a revised report submitted after a reconsideration of value was submitted by the lender. Just my opinion, if you think it was not about "value" that's your right to think that.
In my opinion what happened is, original appraisal report below contract price, ROV sent, appraisal report changed to be 38% higher than original opinion of value, but still not at contract price so they filed a complaint with the board and again, you are 100% CORRECT, this appraiser failed to mention a lot of things in his report, but some of this was about value, an opinion of value his client did NOT like.