The Chained CPI (C-CPI-U) removes substitution bias from the traditional CPI by updating its market basket of goods more frequently (monthly/quarterly) to reflect how consumers shift purchases in response to relative price changes, unlike the older CPI which used fixed baskets, thus overstating inflation when prices rose. It uses a formula that "chains" these updated baskets together, giving a more accurate picture of the true cost of living by incorporating substitution across categories (like buying chicken instead of turkey when chicken prices rise). While technically superior, it has a time lag and isn't used for most U.S. government inflation adjustments.Speaking of siding... Lennar recently bought out a local builder that was part owned by the son of an appraiser. So, their new homes are the same price, only instead of brick siding and vinyl trim, the new ones under construction are all vinyl siding... I bet there are other issues. They are not competing with anyone else in town except Horton...and what kind of competition is that?
So, my choice is a non-modified MH, or a small older low quality stick built for comps. Any strategy suggestions?
I'm assuming no prior sales with the current configuration.Private transaction. REO property a contractor bought at tax sale, remodeled the kitchen and new flooring. I cannot see the under carriage but it clearly started out life as a single wide with vaulted ceiling. Then sometime since 1985 it was added on...twice. One end and one full side so that it now is a 'blended" part MH and part stick. HUD/FNMA not applied. Private sale, non-conforming 15 year note likely (definitely it isn't secondary market because this bank does not do that) so this is a question of valuation, not regulation. What's it worth?
More to the point, what do you do when you have no comparables that are blended MH/stick built. The sale price is below the typical stick built house of the same age and above any older MHs. More like that of the newer MHs in the area (and this is an area of predominately MHs and older stick builts, just outside a city limits and in a small rural subdivision.
There is no MLS listing of it recently. But was listed in 2009 which makes no mention of the MH undercarriage. So, my choice is a non-modified MH, or a small older low quality stick built for comps. Any strategy suggestions?
Its hard to say without market evidence. I would lean towards what the main structure is before the addition(s). But like anything else in real estate it could vary by location and market expectations.What would a typical buyer think of it? Would it matter to them if its a hybrid or not? Also, IMO, depends on the value range.
It appears to be about 50/50, with 2 additions (one side and an end) being stick built. The marriage line in the vaulted ceiling suggests it was a single wide originally as are many of the nearby older units.Since the main part of the dwelling (I'm assuming) is MH I'd lean towards that unless you have data to show otherwise.
Is that the border wall? Should had immigrant labor built it.