J Grant
Elite Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2003
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Florida
The argument for lowering of standards is the negative argument- there are no studies linking fee and quality ,no studies showing more education leads to a better appraiser, and next, no studies that geo competency is needed for a typical SFR. Then the "idiot" examples come forth- anecdotes about a loser who graduated college, a terrible appraisal done at a high fee, or a geo competent appraiser who did a lousy job..
What legitimate poll allows unlimited multiple choices that lead to a skewed result? The poll is set up, from the narrowest first category to the last and broadest, to convey that in varying degrees, geo competence is not required.
This negation of geo competency was introduced here as a testing of the waters but my prediction is it will not end here, and we will see it as the next benchmark of change sought by stakeholders.
What legitimate poll allows unlimited multiple choices that lead to a skewed result? The poll is set up, from the narrowest first category to the last and broadest, to convey that in varying degrees, geo competence is not required.
This negation of geo competency was introduced here as a testing of the waters but my prediction is it will not end here, and we will see it as the next benchmark of change sought by stakeholders.
Last edited:
