- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- California
Okay gang,
I'd like to see how you folks feel about the process of requiring trainees to gain their experience hours under supervision from a fully licensed or certified appraiser, with the principal being held completely responsible for the work of the trainee.
The reason I ask is because I seem to be noticing a lot of references to the responsibility that established appraisers have toward the profession when it comes to training new blood. Recently, we have had several references from trainess commenting on the general graying of the members of our profession and how if we don't change our attitudes there will be a looming shortage of qualified appraisers to handle the workload. At least one of the professional appraiser groups have also commented on this subject. I'd like to hear from the rank and file.
I'd put this up as a poll, but I know that it would be skewed by the number of trainees, whose opinions would be understandibly biased on this subject. Besides, having an opinion is one thing; explaining it in a reasonable manner is another. In this case, your reasons are at least as informative as your opinions.
So I put the following questions to my peers.
Do you think that there is a significant danger that there will be a shortage of appraisers in the next five years unless more of the established veterans get involved in the mentoring process?
Do you think that the number of fully qualified appraisers online is sufficiently in balance to not worry about increasing our ranks beyond the current and proposed processes in place?
Do you think there will be an oversupply of appraisers in five years unless we thin out the existing herd some?
Anybody can respond to this discussion because we all recognize there are two sides to it. Let's see if we can discuss this subject without getting into class warfare, okay? This is a simple supply and demand question.
I'd like to see how you folks feel about the process of requiring trainees to gain their experience hours under supervision from a fully licensed or certified appraiser, with the principal being held completely responsible for the work of the trainee.
The reason I ask is because I seem to be noticing a lot of references to the responsibility that established appraisers have toward the profession when it comes to training new blood. Recently, we have had several references from trainess commenting on the general graying of the members of our profession and how if we don't change our attitudes there will be a looming shortage of qualified appraisers to handle the workload. At least one of the professional appraiser groups have also commented on this subject. I'd like to hear from the rank and file.
I'd put this up as a poll, but I know that it would be skewed by the number of trainees, whose opinions would be understandibly biased on this subject. Besides, having an opinion is one thing; explaining it in a reasonable manner is another. In this case, your reasons are at least as informative as your opinions.
So I put the following questions to my peers.
Do you think that there is a significant danger that there will be a shortage of appraisers in the next five years unless more of the established veterans get involved in the mentoring process?
Do you think that the number of fully qualified appraisers online is sufficiently in balance to not worry about increasing our ranks beyond the current and proposed processes in place?
Do you think there will be an oversupply of appraisers in five years unless we thin out the existing herd some?
Anybody can respond to this discussion because we all recognize there are two sides to it. Let's see if we can discuss this subject without getting into class warfare, okay? This is a simple supply and demand question.