But it's still a "ghetto" in your mind. That's fine as long as you don't allow it to bias your opinions and conclusions.
This thread got started of on the wrong foot (IMO.)
Maybe we should consider “working class neighborhoods” and their occupants like the caste system of India where the four classes were the Brahmins (priestly people), the Kshatriyas (also called Rajanyas, who were rulers, administrators and warriors), the Vaishyas (artisans, merchants, tradesmen and farmers), and Shudras (labouring classes).
Or perhaps the social classes of the Renaissance which were composed of four social classes: the nobles, the merchants, the tradesmen and the unskilled workers.
What the original post is discussing is the economic component of property appraisal.
Here is how HUD explains it. From Chapters 3 and 4 of the old 4150.2
Relation of Ownership Expense to Family Incomes. Families usually select homes in neighborhoods where typical occupants have financial means similar to their own. A home that is too costly for these families to purchase or maintain will have limited marketability.
Consider neighborhood and other external factors that influence property value, including real estate and non-real estate influences. For example, when most of the neighborhood's residents are employed by one major employer who is relocating out of the region, the neighborhood may experience a decline in values. The term "non-real estate influenced", however, must never include racial composition.
I know, I know. This is not about race. But there is a clear bias of thought or perception that is not appropriate for an appraiser (posting on a social platform for appraisers and appraisal issues.)