• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Zoning Non-Conformity: Lot Size or Use?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ZZGAMAZZ

Elite Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Professional Status
Certified Residential Appraiser
State
California
Subject is a 880 sqft SFR on a 25 x 125.90, or 3149, sqft lot in Long Beach zoned R-1-N with minimum site requirements of 50 ft width and 6000 sqft total area.

The "Non-conformity" section of the General Plan appears to address the concept of non-conforming in regard to use rather than lot size.

I'm trying to determine whether the lot is "legal non-conforming" and will speak with Planning ASAP...and then deal with the potential for re-build.

In general, do my peers feel that lot size is the basis for non-conformity, or do you feel that the concept should pertain to land use.
 
If the developed site was in existance prior to the current zoning standards being created, it is likely legal non conforming. Thus I would say lot size.
 
Mr. Boyd (forcing me to go public):

Just because there is no legitimate NBA contender in NorCal doesn't mean that you should take the liberty to embrace Socratics when I'm trying to head out the door for a critical tip-off.

The definition of utility per FREA (9th ed., p 45) as "serving a useful purpose" doesn't help much; and it's possible that an operational definnition of utility is needed--although in my limited experience I would not wish to defend utility as the basis of my decision to describe legal conformity.

p.s. Michigan Mark: A team named the "Pistons" are being broadcast live now. I didn't realize that they still play professional bball in Detroit???
 
Last edited:
"Subject is a 880 sqft SFR on a 25 x 125.90, or 3149, sqft lot in Long Beach zoned R-1-N with minimum site requirements of 50 ft width and 6000 sqft total area. The "Non-conformity" section of the General Plan appears to address the concept of non-conforming in regard to use rather than lot size."

Review of Municipal Records for the Subject Property indicate the Site as a Legal, Non-conforming, Lot in a Residential Zone which pre-exists current Zoning. The current Single Family Residential Use conforms to current Zoning Use Ordinance.

Non-conforming lots are atypical [or TYPICAL] due to more recent upzoning and have [ or have NO] adverse impact on marketability as demonstrated by the best available market data.
______
(at least 1 comparable in SCA should also be on an LNC Lot)
 
MK:

Thanks as always. Do you, or do you not, address rebuild status in the zoning analysis?
 
Because what the city tells you today may change tommorow. Make the report "subject to" a rebuild letter from the city. The client will have to obtain a rebuild letter. Before you sign off on the rebuild letter, call the person who signed the letter to verify. Therefore, you will be covered in case any issues come up in the future, and keep a copy in your work file.
 
I try not to use the term "legal" in connection with "non-conforming." One term is self evident (it either conforms or doesn't conform in some way to the current laws or ordinances). To say with a certainty that the lot is legal (legally created, subdivided, etc) would require some research that most appraisers don't have the time, engergy or expertise. You'd have to search the chain of title going back to when the lot got that way and then compare this information with the laws at that time.

Many municipal planning officials (Sonoma County, for example) no longer use the term "non-conforming" in regards to lots which are substandard in some manner but were like that before the law was enacted. They just call them legal lots.
 
MK:

Thanks as always. Do you, or do you not, address rebuild status in the zoning analysis?

Sometimes. (I know, I know... I used the term "legal, non-conforming." In this case I had a recorded copy of a certificate of compliance which is a document officially declaring the parcel as having been legally created.

Zoning Compliance: RL1601 - Rangeland District - 160 acre minimum lot size. Maximum dwelling density is one dwelling per 160 acres. As the lot is smaller than the 160 acre minimum and was created prior to the implementation of the RL160 zoning district it is considered legal, non-conforming. This district is intended to create and preserve areas for, (A) the grazing of livestock, (B) the production and harvest of natural resources, and (C) the protection of such natural resources as watershed lands from fire, pollution, erosion, and other detrimental effects. Processing of products produced on the premises would be permitted as would certain commercial activities associated with crop and animal raising. Typically the R-L District would be applied to lands for incorporation into Type II Agricultural Preserves, other lands generally in range use, and intermixed smaller parcels and other contiguous lands, the inclusion of which is necessary for the protection and efficient management of rangelands. (Ord. No. 3639 (part), adopted 1987) A single family residence is among the permitted uses. Accessory structures and an accessory dwelling unit are also permitted uses.

Zoning compliance is legal, non-conforming and has been grandfathered. Improvements, as proposed, are a legal, permitted and conforming use. The parcel cannot be further subdivided into smaller lots. The current improvements are reasonably typical for the area and represent highest and best use. Clients often ask the appraiser to provide an opinion as to whether or not any improvments can be rebuilt when zoning compliance is listed as legal, non-conforming. Please note that only the Mendocino County Planning and Building Department can make a definitive statement as they are the controlling authority. The subject's improvements are a conforming use, the parcel size is smaller than the minimum lot size under the the applicable zoning district. It has been grandfathered and is considered a legal lot. The information below is from the County's planning and building department website. The appraiser believes the improvements can be rebuilt if destroyed but makes no guarantees or warranties whatsoever. If client needs a rebuild letter, the property owner can request this service from the Ukiah office of the Mendocino County Planning and Building Department. There is typically a fee for such a letter.

Division I of Title 20--Inland Zoning Code (Mendocino County)
Sec. 20.204.015 Restoration of Damaged Structures.
(A) Whenever a structure, the use of which does not conform with the regulations for the zone in which it is located or a structure which does not comply with the standards of yard spaces, height of structures, distances between structures, parking, etc., prescribed in the regulations for the zone in which the structure is located shall be destroyed by fire or other calamity or by act of God or by the public enemy, the structure may be restored and the nonconforming use may be resumed provided restoration is started within one (1) year and diligently pursued to completion.

(B) Whenever a structure, the use of which does not conform with the regulations for the zone in which it is located, or a structure which does not comply with the standards of yard spaces, height of structures, distance between structures, parking, etc., prescribed in the regulations for the zone in which it is located shall be voluntarily razed, the structure shall not be restored except in full conformity with the regulations of the zone in which it is located, and the nonconforming use shall not be resumed. (Ord. No. 3639 (part), adopted 1987)
 
In our neck of the woods-the zoning codes define non-conforming sites and uses separately- rebuild issue is also specifically dealt with in the zoning code and generally states that the non-conforming use cannot be expanded or altered in such a way that increases the non conformity. Also the non-conforming use can be terminated as a right if such use is discontinued for a period of six months or more. The non-conforming use can be rebuilt if destroyed as long as the damage is less than 50% or sometines 60% of the market value of the subject as determine by local property appraiser.

That's the way it is here but it probably doesn't help you much! You definately need to review the applicable zoning code in detail and get their responses in writing for your file.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top