• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

All Solar, Et Al, In 12 Years?

Status
Not open for further replies.
But Hollywood is still there.

The sun will still shine.

The ocean will still have waves.

Rich people will still want to be there.

Detroit?

Not so.

Really, really rich people live where they want.

For example, Bill Gates and Warren Buffet do not live in California. Of the top 10 billionaires, only Larry Ellison lives in California. The rest don't.

Celebrity Homes

Full List: There is only 129 of them.

http://www.lonny.com/Celebrity+Homes/articles
 
The Aussies were complaining that too many rich folks were buying acreage in NSW to use as bug out shelters for when "the people" of other countries have had enough.

This morning there was news that an Egyptian billionaire bought some islands from Greece (cause you know they need the money) He is going to start his own country with Syrian refugees to fill it. Doesn't matter that for 2,000+ years people did not live on those islands for some reason, they will now suddenly be habitable - money buys everything, even your own country.

Where people "live" is only a matter of what's on their driver's license when they own multiple properties in different places.

That's a fact that poor folks don't seem to understand.

.
 
Try and build and use a working outhouse in suburbia these days
Public pay toilets on each block...to get back some of the tax revenue lost when they don't get the franchise tax, the sales tax etc....Government can be innovative.
 
yeah right,

and public pay toilet monitors/attendants 24/7 with pensions and benefits and really expensive toilet cleaning brushes.

Pass.

.
 
How about a bake sale on the white house lawn?
 
My CPA warned me that California could tax me if I had any clients in CA even if the property was a thousand miles away
http://savetheeaglesinternational.o...10-20-times-more-than-previously-thought.html.

RSPB_to_have_its_own_turbine.jpg
 
Last edited:
Siberia could become pockmarked with giant craters: Global warming is releasing 'explosive and violent' levels of methane under the ground, warn experts
  • Experts are using satellites to monitor at ice and soil humps called pingos
  • They fear these pingos could erupt due rising methane levels underground
  • One such giant crater formed last year in the Yamal region of Siberia
  • Researchers have issued an alert that cities and towns in northern regions are at risk due to global warming releasing potentially explosive methane
The warning follows detailed study of one of dozens of new craters spotted in remote regions of Siberia in the past year and a half.

In particular, Russian scientists spent months over the summer examining enormous craters that had appeared in the Yamal region of Siberia.

A pingo is a mound of earth-covered ice found in the Arctic that can reach up to 230 ft (70m) in height and up to 2,000 ft (600m) in diameter.

In the case of B-1, warming from geothermal heat caused it to 'thaw and its half melted ice core [became] filled with gas that originates from the depth through cracks and faults in the ground.

The crater is now a lake, some 82ft (25 metres) deep, according to new images.

Dr Igor Yeltsov, deputy director of the institute, recently compared the erupting pingos to the process of methane bursting from the ocean floor which may have led to losses of ships and planes in the Bermuda Triangle.

'In the last decades, temperatures have climbed and caused the release of gas hydrates. This resembles a nuclear reaction,' he told The Siberian Times.

'Most gas hydrates are safely hidden, but there are territories, like Yamal, where they begin to decompose and we must closely monitor these areas.

'If the warming continues at the same pace, our northern cities, located close to Yamal - such as Salekhard, Nadym, and Novy Urengoy - are in real danger.'

The scientists identified one melting permafrost hump that could 'explode at any moment', said senior researcher Dr Vladimir Olenchenko.

'We will monitor this pingo remotely from space,' he said.

2CA5ECCD00000578-3244976-image-a-20_1442938870648.jpg



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3244976/Siberia-pockmarked-giant-craters-Global-warming-releasing-explosive-levels-methane-warn-experts.html#ixzz3mXBSfnfy
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

.
 
PG&E Proposal Would Levy New Taxes On Solar Homeowners

The California legislature recently took a step forward in the fight against climate change by voting to boost the state’s renewable energy portfolio standard to 50% by 2030. But before our legislators start congratulating each other for their leadership in advance of the Paris climate negotiations, it’s important to note that the final version of Senate Bill 350 is the end result of a relentless lobbying effort from Big Energy and Big Oil and opens the floodgates to potentially crippling attacks on the rooftop solar industry.

Case in point are anti-solar proposals from PG&E and other investor owned utilities currently pending before the state’s Public Utilities Commission. If these proposals were to move forward, California would go from clean energy leader to a red herring in the fight for our energy future. The only reason they have a chance to succeed is that SB 350 does not include any provisions that directly address rooftop solar.

At this point, you may find yourself pausing and asking aloud: “How can we get to 50% clean energy in 15 years WITHOUT rooftop solar?” Well, the short answer is: We won’t. And without protections in state law, rooftop solar finds itself in a highly vulnerable position.

This week, solar advocacy group The Alliance for Solar Choice filed a tax opinion that the IOU proposals to the PUC would force solar customers to pay new state and federal income taxes on the value of the power they send back to the grid. This would effectively slash the value of rooftop solar systems and cause mass customer confusion. With the state government ostensibly trying to encourage renewable energy, it seems wildly hypocritical to punish consumers for choosing to invest their own money in becoming part of the solution. It’s tantamount to taxing the sun, which I’m not sure the sun would appreciate.

The TASC opinion was drafted by Ed Kleinbard, a law school professor at the University of Southern California’s Gould School of Law. And lest you think I only reference it out of my bias as a USC alum, Mr. Kleinbard’s credentials are strong, having served as Chief of Staff to the US Congress Joint Committee on Taxation, among a litany of impressive roles.

Tax credits and successful government programs like net energy metering have led to a boom in the rooftop solar market because they make the transition more affordable for low- and medium-income consumers. But where there’s a boom, there’s a bust, and the IOUs are on the downside of this equation. That’s why they’re enlisting the best lawyers and lobbyists money can buy and fighting every threat to their status quo.

Nevermind that their efforts could put California behind South Carolina when it comes to clean energy leadership. Nevermind that a majority of Californians – and Americans – consistently support efforts to embrace renewable energy and rooftop solar as a means of curbing pollution and protecting consumers. Nevermind that we’re running out of time before we reach the tipping point in the fight against climate change.

http://cleantechnica.com/2015/09/22/pge-proposal-levy-new-taxes-solar-homeowners/

I have noticed that everything about climate change hinges on taxation and tax credits. It is only fair that the tax code be rigorously enforced. Revenue received from taxable sources is taxable unless specifically excluded by the tax code. Getting a free ride on the backs of utility rate payers in the name of global warming has its limits. It is not fair to shift the cost burden of clean energy onto people who can't afford solar panels or can't take advantage of them.
 
El Niño Buffers U.S. Wind Power Dreams

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) made it official last week. The current El Niño is classified as a strong event.

An El Niño falls into the “strong” category if weekly sea surface temperatures depart from the average by more than two degrees Celsius.

In fact, this El Niño has nudged ahead of the 1997 El Niño as the strongest in the modern era!

Meteorologists believe this occurrence is actually the most potent since 1948. And it’s expected to persist through winter and into spring.

Every El Niño’s effects are different. At the moment, this one is having a surprisingly negative effect on the wind power industry in the United States.

You see, this occurrence of El Niño has produced the weakest winds across the United States in 40 years. Forecasters say this situation will continue and may even worsen through the spring of 2016.

This might not seem like such a big deal, at first. Wind isn’t a huge part of our country’s power generation, right?

Not so fast.

Wind is no longer just a mere marginal source of power for the electric industry. According to Bloomberg New Energy Finance, wind power installations in the United States surged 800% last year. Our country is now the second largest user of wind power technology, behind only China.

Wind accounted for 4.4% of U.S. power generation in 2014. That’s up from just 1.9% five years ago. In some states, wind makes up an even larger chunk of power generation. Wind provides nearly 10% of electricity production in Texas and 7% in California.

The overall effect of these calm conditions is that electric output from U.S. wind farms fell by 6% in the first half of this year. That happened despite wind power capacity rising by 9%.

Overall, U.S. wind farms operated at only about a third of their total generating capacity in the first half of 2015.

The lack of wind has had very real effects on some utilities, and also on some yieldcos.

These include the likes of NextEra Energy (NEE), NextEra Energy Partners (NEP), NRG Energy (NRG), NRG Yield(NYLD), Pattern Energy (PEGI), and even Duke Energy (DUK).

It’s a serious matter for these firms. The CEO of NRG Energy, David Crane, told analysts last month, “We never anticipated a drop-off in the wind resource as we have witnessed over the past six months.”

Even the rating agency Standard & Poor’s is weighing in. After downgrading some wind farm bonds, S&P stated, “Although our current expectation is that the wind resource will revert back to historical averages, at this time it is unclear when this will happen.”

It’s already been a tough 2015. Year to date, NEE is 10 % lower, PEGI fell 16.5%, DUK is down 18%, NEP fell 23%, NRG is down 31.5%, and NYLD is down a whopping 69%.

Of course, utilities have been hit by the rising interest rate expectations. But the lack of strong breezes in the United States has given a little tailwind to the downside for the wind power-related stocks.

Obviously, El Niño will eventually subside and wind patterns across the country will return to normal.

But until then, the wind power generation industry in the United States will continue to suffer. Shareholders in the wind-related yieldcos and utilities will continue to take a battering for an unknown amount of time.

Maybe they can somehow tap into the hot air generated by opponents of President Obama’s Clean Power Plan. They’re having a field day right now with the Plan’s heavy reliance on fickle breezes.

http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2015/09/21/u-s-wind-power-el-nino/

Wind energy makes up 7% of the total supply in Calfiornia. And the grid cannot depend on the wind. Even storage batteries can't make up for a prolonged cessation of wind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top