• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

All Solar, Et Al, In 12 Years?

Status
Not open for further replies.
How about a cluster of those bad boy wind turbines just offshore at Nags Head? A liberal thing?


I have no problem with them being off Nags Head or any Barrier Island along NC Coast. Down East its mostly liberal area of NC with exception to Research Triangle around Raleigh which is heavy Liberal voters also. We are a Purple State. Actually, I like it that way. Lefties and Righties balance is a good thing.
 
Remember when you used to buy a dry car battery, get it home, add the acid. Wait awhile and add the water, then check the water level in the battery once a month? I miss the danger of playing with battery acid.
:sneaky:

.

Those where safe.

Why Some Lithium-Ion Batteries Explode

Real-time images have captured the chain reaction that causes lithium-ion batteries to explode.

The process can occur in just milliseconds: Overheated battery modules create a domino effect, producing more and more heat, and the battery explodes. But it turns out that not all batteries are equally likely to fail, according to a new study published today (April 28) in the journal Nature Communications.

"The presence of certain safety features can mitigate against the spread of some of this thermal runaway process," said study co-author Paul Shearing, a chemical engineer at the University College London in the United Kingdom. Those features include mechanical supports inside the battery, Shearing said.




The results suggest some ways to make rechargeable lithium-ion batteries safer, the researchers wrote in the paper. [9 Odd Ways Your Tech Device May Injure You]

Rechargeable batteries

Lithium-ion batteries are the workhorses of modern-day gadgets; they're found in everything from smartphones to jumbo jets to the Tesla Model S. They are typically made with two layers of material, called the anode and the cathode, separated by an electrically conducting fluid.Lithium ions start off in the cathode, a layer of material that, in laptop and cellphone batteries, typically includes cobalt, manganese, nickel and oxygen. When the batteries are charged, electricity drives the lithium ions from the cathode, across an ion-filled electrolyte fluid, and into the anode, which is made of stacks of graphite. As the battery drains, the lithium ions return from the anode back into the cathode. The batteries typically come in cells; a laptop battery may have three or four cells, whereas a Tesla Model S may have thousands, Shearing said.

Chain reaction

Hundreds of millions of lithium-ion batteries are produced every year, and catastrophic failure, such as explosion or melting, is rare, Shearing said. Still, there have been 43 product recalls for defective lithium-ion batteries since 2002, according to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

Batteries can blow up or melt when internal electrical components short-circuit, when mechanical problems crop up after a fall or an accident, or when they are installed incorrectly, Shearing said. But at the heart, all of these failures occur because one portion of the battery gets too hot and can't cool down quickly enough, creating a chain reaction that generates more and more heat.

"It's kind of this snowball process that we call thermal runaway," Shearing told Live Science.

During thermal runaway, the miniature battery modules can melt, giving off heat, and the electrolyte material between the anode and the cathode may even boil, Shearing said.

http://www.livescience.com/50643-watch-lithium-battery-explode.html


Why lithium batteries keep catching fire

IN THE past year rechargeable batteries containing the element lithium have been in the headlines for all the wrong reasons. Investigators in Japan are investigating why a lithium-ion battery overheated on a Boeing 787 Dreamliner at Narita airport. Last year Boeing grounded its entire fleet of the next-generation plane after the lithium batteries on two of the aircraft caught fire. (The 787s returned to the air after being fitted with a modified system to protect the aircraft against battery fires.) Tesla, a maker of electric cars, performed a remote software update to its Model S luxury cars after two fires, which were blamed on road debris damaging the undertray containing the vehicles' lithium batteries. Lithium batteries are widely used because of their high energy density: in other words, their ability to store a lot of energy in a lightweight, compact form. But they have a tendency to cause expensive machinery to go up in smoke.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2014/01/economist-explains-19


Lithium

Like all alkali metals, lithium is highly reactive and flammable.

Because of its high reactivity, lithium never occurs freely in nature, and instead, only appears in compounds, which are usually ionic.

Lithium reacts with water easily, but with noticeably less energy than other alkali metals do. The reaction forms hydrogen gas and lithium hydroxide in aqueous solution. Because of its reactivity with water, lithium is usually stored under cover of a hydrocarbon, often petroleum jelly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium

I used to make metallic sodium (alkali metal) bombs. It reacts with water in an exothermic reaction (heat) producing hydrogen gas which ignites due to the heat of reaction. Flushing metallic sodium down the toilet causes an explosion and fire. Oh those youthful days in Chem Lab at the University. :)

Instead, we have lithium batteries that explode and catch fire. Who knew? Anyone that has taken freshman chemistry knew.
 
I have no problem with them being off Nags Head or any Barrier Island along NC Coast. Down East its mostly liberal area of NC with exception to Research Triangle around Raleigh which is heavy Liberal voters also. We are a Purple State. Actually, I like it that way. Lefties and Righties balance is a good thing.
Liberal, conservative, blue, red----what's the difference? If you want to compromise the tourist industry by all means plant some of those bad boys just off shore and watch the tourists go elsewhere.
 
Liberal, conservative, blue, red----what's the difference? If you want to compromise the tourist industry by all means plant some of those bad boys just off shore and watch the tourists go elsewhere.

I don't know that tourist would go elsewhere. Where else would they go? Plus Islands like Topsail(I was just down there) have mostly privately owned properties. If your one street back you cant see the ocean anyway. There may be a physical reason why they have not put Windmills in those places. These Island move! Simply; What happens is the south end slowly back fills the north end in a never ending cycle due to ocean currents. My buddy has a house at ocean isle and when he bought the place he was one street back, several years later it tuned into ocean front. Now he is back to being one or two streets back. Something like that.
 
WRT batteries

My next door neighbor is a professional mechanic and used to work at a Toyota dealership. He told me that - at the time - they had to take special precautions when working on a Prius: They rope the car off and prohibit anyone from speaking with the mechanic while he's inside the enclosure (so as to not distract him), they have the special protocols and checklists to ensure that the power is disconnected when they're working in the car, and they keep a wooden "pusher" nearby for use in case the mechanic gets caught in the electrical current.
 
what's the difference? If you want to compromise the tourist industry by all means plant some of those bad boys just off shore and watch the tourists go elsewhere.
Oh, I wish that would work...oh, how I wish that would work.
 
Whelp,

We done do'ed it now!

Global warming: trees going on strike

Paris (AFP) - Trees, crucial absorbers of climate-harming carbon dioxide gas, may finally be balking at an ever-earlier spring season brought on by global warming, researchers said Wednesday.

Over the past several decades, trees across central Europe have been steadily sprouting their spring leaves earlier in response to warmer temperatures, they said.

As a result, forests absorbed more carbon dioxide in a longer growing season -- a boon that has been worked into global warming projections. But a study published in the science journal Nature said trees have slowed their pace of seasonal advance -- raising fears it may stop altogether.

The slowdown "suggests a current and possible future weakening of forests' carbon uptake due to the declining temperature sensitivity of (trees)," lead author Yongshuo ** of Peking University in Beijing told AFP.

For the study, an international team crunched decades of data drawn from seven common types of trees like beech, silver birch and horse chestnut at 1,245 sites in the wild ranging from Denmark to Bosnia. The authors said previous studies had relied on saplings or twigs tested in laboratory settings and not exposed to real-world changes.

In real life, they found, leaf-sprouting happened steadily earlier over two study periods: 1980-1994 and 1999-2013 -- about 13 days overall over the past three decades. But when the scientists compared the two terms, they noticed the advance of earlier sprouting had slowed by 40 percent in 1999-2013.

"We found the response (to earlier spring) has declined over the past three decades, and strong winter warming may further reduce it," said Yongshuo.

The planet's average temperature has already risen 0.8 degrees Celsius (1.4 degrees Fahrenheit) since the Industrial Revolution. The UN goal is to limit global warming to two C overall.

But wait, trees only stopped early leafing in the past 14 years. What was the temperature rise in the past 14 years? Oh, maybe the baby boomer trees are just getting older and less responsive too.

The authors believe the trees may be trying to protect themselves against extreme weather. :rof:

Many types of trees need a period of cold temperatures before they are ready to sprout spring leaves -- a hardwired mechanism to ensure winter has truly passed before they push out buds.

Weather conditions have become increasingly unpredictable and the trees' slower advance "would thus reduce the risk of late spring frost damage," the study said.

http://news.yahoo.com/global-warming-trees-going-strike-211924785.html

.
 
Unlocking the origins of global warming: Scientists pinpoint signs of climate change as early as 1940...and it began in Africa
  • Scientists analyzed computer simulations for changes in temperature
  • First signs seen in the 1940s in parts of Australia, south Asia and Africa
  • This is because these regions generally exhibited a narrow range of temperatures, making it easier to spot a trend of warming
upload_2015-9-23_22-9-27.png

This year is tipped to be the hottest on record as global temperatures continue to soar.

Now researchers have revealed for the first time when and where signs of this global warming first appeared in the past, by analyzing new computer simulations of the climate over more than a century.

By running simulations from as far back as the 1870s, the researchers detected what they believe to be the first signs as early as the 1940s in parts of Australia, south east Asia and Africa.

‘We examined average and extreme temperatures because they were always projected to be the measure that is most sensitive to global warming,’ said Dr Andrew King of Arc, lead author of the study, published in the journal Environmental Research Letters.

‘Remarkably our research shows that you could already see clear signs of global warming in the tropics by the 1960s but in parts of Australia, South East Asia and Africa it was visible as early as the 1940s.’

The reason the first changes in average temperature and temperature extremes appeared in the tropics was because those regions generally experienced a much narrower range of temperatures.

Closer to the poles, the emergence of climate change in the temperature record appeared later, but by the period 1980 to 2000 the temperature record in most regions of the world were showing clear global warming signals.
One of the few exceptions to this clear global warming signal was found in large parts of the continental United States, particularly on the Eastern coast and up through the central states.

The experts warned these regions can expect to see signs of global warming in the next decade and other parts of the world will likely see more extreme weather events too.

Dr Hawkins said: 'The greatest impacts of climate change are likely to come as some extreme weather events, such as storms, floods, heat waves and droughts get bigger and occur more often.

‘We expect the first heavy precipitation events with a clear global warming signal will appear during winters in Russia, Canada and northern Europe over the next 10 to 30 years.

‘This is likely to bring pronounced precipitation events on top of the already existing trend towards increasingly wet winters in these regions.’

The study echoes data used in the IPCC's recent report. It said global warming over the last century occurred in two phases - from the 1910s to 1940s, with a rise of 0.35°C - and from the 1970s to the present, with a rise of 0.55 °C.

Its latest report also noted that 11 of the 12 warmest years have occurred in the past 12 years.

It is not the first time the globe has warmed up, but this is the latest trend and the first since records began.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3246036/Unlocking-origins-global-warming-Scientists-pinpoint-signs-climate-change-early-1940-began-Africa.html#ixzz3mcOM0OTb

.
 
The slowdown "suggests a current and possible future weakening of forests' carbon uptake due to the declining temperature sensitivity of (trees)," lead author Yongshuo ** of Peking University in Beijing told AFP.

A natural variation beyond the control of humans.

The authors believe the trees may be trying to protect themselves against extreme weather. :rof:

So they trained a frog to jump on the verbal command jump.

They said to the frog in a soft voice, "jump". The frog jumped. They measured the distance and recorded it.

They proceeded to cut off a leg of the frog.

They said to the frog in a soft voice, "jump". The frog jumped. They measured the distance and recorded it. Not as far as the first time as you might have guessed.

They proceeded to cut off another leg of the frog.

They said to the frog in a soft voice, "jump". The frog jumped. They measured the distance and recorded it. Not as far as the last time as you might have guessed.

They continued the process of removing a leg of the frog until they cut off the last leg. The frog had no legs.

They said to the frog in a soft voice, "jump". The frog did not jump. It just sat there.

They said to the frog in a raised voice, "jump". The frog did not jump. It just sat there.

They said to the frog in a loud voice, "jump". The frog did not jump. It just sat there.

Finally, they screamed at the frog, "JUMP!". The frog did not jump. It just sat there.

Conclusion: Cutting off legs from a frog causes a degradation in their hearing until the frog become totally deaf.

This is known as the Climate Scientist joke because it mirrors their way of thinking and their conclusions on their research.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top