All Solar, Et Al, In 12 Years?

[Randolph Kinney]

Very true.

Has anyone paused to think about the solution to the ozone hole growing larger?

At Montreal, the participants agreed to freeze production of CFCs at 1986 levels and to reduce production by 50% by 1999. The international treaty designed to protect the ozone layer by phasing out the production of numerous substances that are responsible for ozone depletion was agreed on 16 September 1987, and entered into force on 1 January 1989.

As a result of the international agreement, the ozone hole in Antarctica is slowly recovering. Climate projections indicate that the ozone layer will return to 1980 levels between 2050 and 2070.

Ozone Hole Bigger Than North America, Study

Nov 14, 2015

Over the Antarctica, the hole in the ozone layer has expanded to become bigger than the North American continent, said scientists, based on information collected in October. Currently it has reached 10 million square miles, just a bit smaller than the record set in 2006, when the size was 10.42 million square miles.

This ozone hole is on one region of earth's stratosphere in which the gas that blocks ultraviolet rays gets depleted below a threshold, according to Weather.com.

However, some improvement is found in the ozone situation, mainly due to recent laws and regulations in various countries, banning the use of ozone-depleting chemicals. Cheeringly, the ozone hole over Antarctica is actually repairing itself, according to Popular Science.

http://www.counselheal.com/articles/15490/20151114/video-ozone-hole-bigger-north-america-study.htm

After COP21 agreement, we can expect the same cause and effect to occur with CO2 and global warming as what is happening to the Ozone protection treaty that went into force in 1989: decades later the ozone hole hits new record highs (no effect).

Especially science "boy" with a small "b"

 

[Cigar]

Randolph posted this picture above"

Revcom.us stands for the Revolutionary Communist Party of the United States, it is a cult run by a guy named Bobby Avakian, he now wants to be called "BA". His late father was a local judge and friend of mine, Bobby had dropped out of Cal to pursue his brand of Communism and his father asked me to give him a job to straighten the kid out. I did hire him and was pursuing getting him into the Carpenter's Union but as soon as his first paycheck was issued I was visited by three FBI agents, they were nice about it, they said they just wanted to be sure I knew who I was hiring, I told them I did and I was trying to help his father out by giving him a productive trade. He didn't last long, he was disrupting the crews he was on preaching communism.

Avakian's "promotion and popularization"

The RCP has said that there are two mainstays of its work: the role of the party press and building a culture of "appreciation, promotion and popularization" of Bob Avakian and his body of work, method, and approach, "along with a whole ensemble of Communist work which is necessary to the bringing forward of a revolutionary people—including building "massive political resistance to the main ways in which, at any given time, the exploitative and oppressive nature of this system is concentrated in the policies and actions of the ruling class and its institutions and agencies" and solving the problems of how to involve the masses in "meaningful revolutionary work"". Others have charged that the RCP has created a cult of personality around Avakian, with dissenting voices driven from the organization. The RCP has countered that over the period of the 1980s and 1990s two parties developed within the organization, representing two fundamentally opposed roads. One, represented by the "official" line of the Party and concentrated in the new synthesis Bob Avakian was championing, and expressed in the Party’s newspaper (the Revolutionary Worker, now Revolution). The other, opposed the new synthesis and revolutionary-communist line, was becoming predominant on all levels of the Party, and "objectively, [this] amounted to abandoning the outlook and aims of the communist revolution, accommodating to the system of imperialism and settling for, at most, reforms within this horrific system." ¹

Let's face it, using the old formula of "follow the money" this whole global warming thing is redistribution or wealth on a worldwide basis, and if you recall Obama's father was a communist and tried to bring Communism to Kenya.


¹ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Communist_Party,_USA

 

[Randolph Kinney]

German scientist: Researchers fiddling with temperature data

December 12, 2015

A German scientist is raising serious questions as to whether government data-keepers have been tampering with scientific data to conjure up warming trends where none exist.

“It is important to understand whether CO2 truly causes climate change,” said Professor Dr. Friedrich-Karl Ewert, “We rely entirely on simulation models. Reality looks very different from simulations.”

Dr. Ewert is professor emeritus of geophysics at the University of Paderborn. He spoke at a scientific conference put on by EIKE, the European Institute for Climate and Energy in Essen, Germany that was co-sponsored by CFACT and the Heartland Institute.

Ewert conducted exhaustive research comparing climate computer models to real world temperature. His findings confirm what others have concluded, that the models run far hotter than measured observations. He points out that the UN IPCC likes to carefully select the dates and data it presents, but that, “if we look at temperature changes over a larger period, any temperature trend disappears.”

In the course of his research, Ewert found something shocking.

“In 2012, we realized that the data offered by NASA was not the same as that offered in 2010. The data had been altered. If in 2010 someone had, for instance, looked up the data for Palma de Mallorca, they would have seen a cooling of .0076 degrees. But in 2012 it suddenly showed a temperature increase of .0074 degrees. This is not a one-off.”

“Until then measurements were sacrosanct. Can you call it fraud or falsification? I’m not a lawyer, but I can say it has been changed retroactively. If I show you the data a negative judgment is justified. In 2012 there was twice as much warming in the sample we examined compared with just two years prior.”

Warming campaigners have been confounded by a lack of any global warming since last century. This contradicts large numbers of computer model projections that warming should have occurred. They’ve attempted to gloss over this inconvenient fact by trumping up records. They routinely claim some period of time as the “hottest ever,” in the expectation that the casual observer will never realize that their records are set by meaningless hundredths of a degree. These tiny measurements run far below the margin of error. Even the word “hottest” is unjustified. Global temperature has been running around one half degree above baseline with just a few years above. Nothing hot about that.

It is fundamental to the scientific method that scientists must adapt their conclusions to fit their data. They must never alter their data to serve a favored conclusion.

In just a few hours we expect negotiators at COP 21, the UN climate conference in Paris to announce a final climate agreement that will shift global power, harm economies, redistribute fortunes and cost trillions of dollars. It is ever increasingly apparent that that deal rests on false promises and false premises.

Dr. Ewert presents a powerful case. If we cannot trust the keepers of the scientific data taxpayers paid for, what is there about global warming we can trust?

http://www.cfact.org/2015/12/12/german-scientist-researchers-fiddling-with-temperature-data/


Busted! Cheating to fool the public and science "boy" with a small "b".

 

[Meandering]

Oh come on.

They need it that way.

So when every one is paying a tax for their carbon foot print, they can point to the real data and say;

See it's working.

The bigger the tax, the more the planet is cooling.

 

[Terrel L. Shields]

Each year, and 2014 will be no different, since it is an El Nino year, NOAA has proclaimed it to be the "hottest year on record"... at least that is what the popular press will say. Of course, when you drill into the numbers you find that it could be...or it might be the 10th hottest. The margin of error is large enough that it might possibly be the hottest year, yet, like these averages over the years, each has a margin of error, so each might or might not be the hottest year. Actually few years compare to 1911, 1934 and 1936, but the pro-GW folks argue that this was only "local" to N. A. and not global. Factoid 2. Most GW consider the "records" to only be calculated since 1980.

 

[Meandering]

First Practical Medical Thermometer
English physician, Sir Thomas Allbutt (1836–1925) invented the first practical medical thermometer used for taking the temperature of a person in 1867. It was portable, 6 inches in length and able to record a patient's temperature in 5  min.

In 1866 Sir Thomas Allbutt introduced the modern clinical thermometer, a welcome alternative to the foot-long instrument that required 20 minutes to register a patient’s temperature.
http://www.britannica.com/biography/Thomas-Clifford-Allbutt

Hummmm. A lot of these climate charts are tracking from 1850 in 10ths of a degree.

I don't think so.

In 1724, Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit introduced the standard temperature scale that bears his name - Fahrenheit Scale - that was used to record changes in temperature in an accurate fashion.

The Fahrenheit scale divided the freezing and boiling points of water into 180 degrees. 32°F was the freezing pint of water and 212°F was the boiling point of water. 0°F was based on the temperature of an equal mixture of water, ice, and salt. Fahrenheit based his temperature scale on the temperature of the human body. Originally, the human body temperature was 100° F on the Fahrenheit scale, but it has since been adjusted to 98.6°F
http://inventors.about.com/od/tstartinventions/a/History-Of-The-Thermometer.htm

Oh wait!
That's an adjustment of 1.4 degrees. There's the global warming.

.
.

 

[Randolph Kinney]

How can anyone be sure of the historical record knowing that Dr. James Hansen was caught diddling the database to show more warming than what was recorded? Fortunately enough researchers (outside of the U.S. government agencies) have captured these databases each year as they are released and can detect the changes.

 

[Meandering]

And who is going to prosecute Dr. James Hansen?
The same guys who get paid from money taken from GSE profits that were going to "get tough" with bad bankers?

Will some university rescind his degree?

 

[Meandering]

 

[Randolph Kinney]