• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

All Solar, Et Al, In 12 Years?

Status
Not open for further replies.
At least a degree in geology gives me the ability to read the actual data and apply the skeptical eye that is necessary when reading popular press interpretations of a science paper by a cub reporter...which is what Al Gore was after dropping out of school.

As for you, you obviously have no ability to read same since your only response in these threads is mere ad hominem attacks. It shows how little a man you really are.

Hmmm! Accusation of ad hominem attack in the midst of an ad hominem attack. Now that's entertainment. I guess I should apologize for labeling you a geologist from Arkansas. Didn't realize that was an attack!

Plan on looking back to see your reaction to the vitriolic attacks on many folks in this thread including our President (dozens against me but I'm a big boy and I definitely consider the source). I'm sure you've taken the same stance with the rest of the "pack" members. If not, isn't that a wee bit inconsistent at best and hypocritical at worst?
 
On Twitter on Saturday night, BP, the British oil giant, called the Paris agreement a “landmark climate change deal” and pledged to be “a part of the solution.” In June, BP, Royal Dutch Shell and Total called for a tax on carbon emissions, saying it would reduce uncertainty and help oil and gas companies figure out the future.
Part of the solution to a problem that doesn't exist?:eyecrazy:

BP is one of many businesses that support action on climate change. It acknowledges that the expected increase of 25% in carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from fossil fuels by 2035 is above what experts say is needed to limit the worst impacts, by keeping the long-term average global temperature rise to two degrees Celsius (2°C). This is not what BP wants to see, but what it currently believes is likely.

So what is BP doing to help? It is taking action that ranges from contributing to the debate on a global solution to delivering lower-carbon energy to customers.

1. Calling for a carbon price
BP says the scale of the climate challenge is such that governments should act by setting a clear carbon policy framework. In particular, BP says that putting a price on carbon emissions – one that treats all carbon equally, whether it comes out of a smokestack or a car exhaust – will make energy efficiency more attractive and lower-carbon energy sources more competitive. This can be done by emissions trading systems or a carbon tax. BP prepares for the future by applying a carbon price in evaluating large new projects.

2. Supplying natural gas
Natural gas should play an increasing role in meeting global energy demand because it produces only about half as much CO₂ as coal per unit of power generated. So, increasing the share of gas versus coal helps to restrain greenhouse gas emissions. BP is playing a key role in providing natural gas as a cleaner alternative to coal. Around half of BP’s current Upstream portfolio is in natural gas and it expects that proportion to grow over the next decade.

BP is developing important gas supply chains to Europe, including the ‘Southern Gas Corridor’ project to bring gas from the Caspian Sea to European markets. BP is also supplying gas to China and India, two countries that are likely to account for more than half of the growth in global energy demand between 2013 and 2035. Other gas production operations are in Indonesia, Oman and Trinidad & Tobago. BP is also working to reduce emissions from gas production through programmes to prevent methane leaks and to reduce flaring.

3. Providing renewable energy
BP invests in renewable energy where it can build commercially viable businesses. BP is investing at scale in Brazilian biofuels, where it doubled the capacity of its largest sugar cane ethanol facility in 2014. Sugar cane ethanol has life cycle greenhouse gas emissions that are 70% lower than conventional transport fuels. BP also has interests in 16 wind farms, which have a total generating capacity of 2,600 megawatts of electricity.

4. Pursuing energy efficiency
BP requires operations to incorporate energy use in their business plans and assess and implement technologies and systems that could improve energy usage. For example, the new Zhuhai 3 petrochemicals joint venture in China is the first site to use BP’s latest technology for producing PTA, which is used in clothes, paint, plastic bottles and other items. Compared with conventional technology, Zhuhai 3 is highly energy efficient and delivers 65% lower greenhouse gas emissions.

5. Supporting research and partnerships
As well as contributing to the policy debate and investing in lower carbon energy, BP supports research on climate change and takes part in joint initiatives on the issue.

One example is the Carbon Mitigation Initiative (CMI) at Princeton University in the US, which describes its mission as being “to lead the way to a compelling and sustainable solution of the carbon and climate change problem.” BP’s Energy Sustainability Challenge (ESC) programme has brought 15 universities together to look at the potential effects of natural resource scarcities on patterns of energy supply and demand. BP also collaborates on specialized models developed with Imperial College London and Princeton to assess possible climate impacts. BP belongs to a number of industry partnerships including the Oil & Gas Climate Initiative, consisting of companies who together produce around 20% of the world’s oil and gas and focused on practical action, sharing best practice and collaboration.

Developing advocacy in 2015
“If governments act to price carbon, this discourages high carbon options and encourages the most efficient ways of reducing emissions widely.”

(I thought they said they wanted all carbon treated equally. If equal, none would be higher than the other)

Letter from chief executives of six oil and gas majors
BP has long supported measures to put a price on carbon emissions and continues to raise its advocacy this year. In June, Bob Dudley and five other CEOs of oil and gas companies wrote to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change supporting carbon pricing, saying: “If governments act to price carbon, this discourages high carbon options and encourages the most efficient ways of reducing emissions widely.” Such options include reduced demand for the most carbon intensive fossil fuels, greater energy efficiency, the use of natural gas in place of coal, increased investment in carbon capture and storage, renewable energy, smart buildings and grids, off-grid access to energy, cleaner cars and new mobility business models and behaviours.
http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/bp-magazine/observations/climate-change-challenge.html

:rof::rof:

And,
would have nothing to do with limiting our competition.

:rof::rof:



.
 
As part of the great unwashed, we don't know what we don't know. Thank God a leftist will be by to help us find our way, we are eternally grateful.
The great unwashed, that's the best description yet for how the devout ones view the deniers. I fear I'm a hopeless case. :-)
 
I hate to have to introduce some logic into this mess,

But really.

If reducing carbon emissions were the goal, wouldn't it first make sense to get rid of those things that are not needed, yet waste oodles of energy?

Take professional sports for instance,

Stadium lights, acres of cars in parking lots, Tons of transmission equipment running on site, and transmitting out, TV, radios, internet, all sucking up electricity.

Is it fair that poor children in Africa should do their homework in the dark while people in developed countries pay a tax to go to professional sporting events?

Add vacationing to that. Wastes fuel all the way round for no "need". Should Philloppineos have to move to escape rising seas because you can afford the carbon tax on your vacation, and the government is going to send that tax money to them to???? To offset their cost of moving???

And why would we need TV and movies anymore? Lots of energy wasted there. Just a radio to receive the daily government messages. That should cut down on some CO2 emissions.

Trade your car in for a horse. That should help, oh, but the state will lose gas tax money.


.



.
 

cartoon-settled-science.jpg
 
My question is where are Philloppineos going to move to, to escape rising seas?

Canada is taking in refugees.

Should economically poor, warm climate people, be moved to northern countries, when they can't afford heat to survive, to escape sinking islands? Will they be relocated to Africa, where it's warmer? Maybe India is taking in refugees. There are lots of islands in the world. Even Manhattan is an island. Should we be relocating people off of those islands now, just incase the earth doesn't care if there is a Carbon Tax and keeps rising the water to swallow them up?

Oh man, and think about all of Florida, rising seas and sink holes there. Maybe all of Florida should be relocated too.

th
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top