- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- California
Why does it matter? Is "not diverse" an indication that any of these individuals are engaged in racist conduct?
It is hard to have 11% in a county where 1.8% of the population identifies as black. Many towns I work exceed 20% Native American, some approach or exceed that as Hispanic. Often you can't tell. But the real problem is, why do we assume that the lack of diversity is by definition, "racism"? No one of any color is prevented from taking the classes, finding a mentor and pursuing a career as an appraiser. I've never had a a "person of color" apply for a trainee. I bet that is the experience of most appraisers.Your county must be one of the few Exceptions
Think of a Collage of Pictures - They typically are not in any specific order and are seemingly random collection -It is hard to have 11% in a county where 1.8% of the population identifies as black. Many towns I work exceed 20% Native American, some approach or exceed that as Hispanic. Often you can't tell. But the real problem is, why do we assume that the lack of diversity is by definition, "racism"? No one of any color is prevented from taking the classes, finding a mentor and pursuing a career as an appraiser. I've never had a a "person of color" apply for a trainee. I bet that is the experience of most appraisers.
What does any of that have to do TAF, appraisal standards, or allegations of appraiser misconduct?arent the chief appraisers the ones who set appraisal policies for their bankster employers?
selective quoting is for the birds![]()
![]()
why no waivers for these borrowers? high priced mortgage?![]()
Even setting aside any possible untruths in these allegations, how can we fix a problem we haven't identified? How can we measure any improvements if we can't see where we're starting from?Think of a Collage of Pictures - They typically are not in any specific order and are seemingly random collection -
"What collage offers artists that cannot be found in flat work alone is the opportunity to add commentary through familiar imagery and objects. It adds to the dimension of the pieces and can further illustrate a point.
They simply are collecting bits and pieces of evidence to support the claim of inequity(not just appraisals).
This is why we have not and will not see the four or Five Appraisals that have stirred up a Hornets nest.
The Whole profession has been charged and the accusers do not have to prove anything. Essentially we have to prove we are Innocent. BUT we can not look at the evidence.
Does that make any sense?