Mejappz
Elite Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2005
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Florida
Well, that is one theory. Here is another possibility.
Company A enters into a contract with Person B to provide work as a contractor, not an employee. Through the course of completing the work on the contract, Person B's work product is very good, and as a result, Company A offers Person B a position as an employee. Of course, that is not as "juicy" because it is just a common occurrence in the business world.
I don’t actually have a problem with that scenario as long as the people being brought in are competent and their work holds up under real-world scrutiny.
Sure, maybe it was just a case of Company A liking Person B’s contract work and offering them a job. That’s one theory, and yes, it happens all the time in business.
But here’s another possibility: when someone develops and promotes a methodology that doesn’t stand up to peer review or actual market behavior, and then that person ends up in a high-level policy role at a GSE, it raises fair questions. Not about the hiring process on its face, but about how influence and alignment shape the profession, especially when the same flawed ideas suddenly start showing up in accepted training and appraisal narratives. That's something that you simply don't want to admit to.
So if it’s just a standard hiring situation, fine. But when the person being hired has a history of pushing weak or unsupported valuation methods, that’s no longer business as usual. That’s a red flag.