• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Bidumbnomics

$100 Billion a year wars is inflationary add in effect of economic sanctions and it triples the inflation effect on us and Western Europe including chain supply damage and inflation on almost all products , we saw this happen during late stages and afterwords with Viewtnam war which led to massive inflation of late seventies. today's economics classes no longer talk about guns and butter and how it effects us. My guess is as we go into more Biden caused wars inflation will come back roaring at some point. Whats interesting is today's military Industrial complex uses way more automation and requires way less labor today then what it did 30 years ago and so we no longer get massive employment from it unlike up through the nineties. Electronics and tech changed most of it. Between High Tech and Robots its a whole new world. Now we have to figure out with do with people as we are going to need way less in the future.
 
They are dumping them like mad not merely to eschew buying them.

Oil and other commodities are rapidly being priced and marketed in the Ruble, Yuan, and other currencies. The mighty dollar could soon be toppled as the go to currency in commodities.
The economies of China and Russia are not doing well. I doubt the world wants to hold Rubles and Yuans. Dollar is still King.
 
Right now we also have Shrinkflation. For example Candy Bars, bag of chips etc the portion size is smaller. The problem Ole Joe has you and businesses can't shrinkflation is Energy. Gallon of gas is still a gallon, Cubic ft of natural gas is still a cubic foot of natural gas Kilowatt of electricity is still a kilowatt etc

The only way to incorporate shrinkflation for energy is to use less , which lowers your standard of living. Question is why? Don't answer that it is about Global climate change. We are a nation of apprx. 331.9 million in a world with a population of 7.888 billion. China pop 1.412 billion and they are using coal as a primary source of energy!

 
Last edited:
I doubt the world wants to hold Rubles and Yuans.
They are trading oil and commodities in Rubles and Yuan...so what does that do to the so-called "$60/bbl" limit the West imposed upon Russian oil exports. Mind you EU countries are breaking rank with so-called "sanctiona' - sanctions which are readily bypassed. Russia is now threatening Latvia over access to the Baltic. India, China, Brazil, Pakistan, etc. are trading within themselves and BRICs is a real threat to "King Dollar"..
 
There seems to be discord amongst the global warming faithful, John Kerry and Al Gore are unhappy with some of the participants at the latest hand wringers get together. What are we going to do? :clapping:
 
The left explores what is beyond the great horizon, brave Tidy Bowl warriors...

Congress Takes on the EV Mandate​

Republicans want to get Democrats on record on the costly rules.​



By
The Editorial Board

Dec. 4, 2023 6:50 pm ET


Journal Editorial Report: EV dealers ask Biden where they're supposed to put the glut. Images: AP/Shutterstock Composite: Mark Kelly
House Republicans have teed up a vote this week on legislation to block President Biden’s back-door electric-vehicle mandate. Democrats are spinning the legislation as an attack on public health, innovation and free markets. The debate is a preview of what we can expect in the 2024 election campaign.


The Environmental Protection Agency “is not imposing an EV mandate,” says a memo from Democrats on the Energy and Commerce Committee opposing the GOP legislation. But the EPA in April proposed tailpipe emissions standards for greenhouse gases that would effectively require that electric vehicles make up two-thirds of car sales in 2032.
The only way auto makers could meet the emissions restrictions is by producing more EVs and fewer gas-powered cars. This is a mandate in everything but name, and it’s already causing enormous problems.
The House GOP bill would prohibit EPA from finalizing its proposed CO2 emissions standards and bar any regulation that would “mandate the use of any specific technology” or “result in limited availability of new motor vehicles” based on the type of engine. This means EPA couldn’t promulgate a similar new mandate.

The Democratic memo accuses Republicans of attacking “EPA’s authority to protect Americans from dangerous air pollution.” But greenhouse gases are ubiquitous and aren’t hazardous to human health, unlike tailpipe pollutants such as sulfur dioxide and particulate matter. Some studies suggest EVs may produce more fine particulate matter—pollutants that lodge deep in the lungs—because their battery weight increases wear and tear from tires. EPA ignores this potential harm.
“American demand for EVs is already outpacing supply,” the Democratic memo says, and “auto manufacturers are independently trending toward EVs because of increasing popularity with consumers.” Then why are auto makers scaling back EV production plans? And why are thousands of auto dealers begging the Administration to tap the brakes on the EPA regulation as EVs pile up on their lots?

Tesla accounted for nearly two-thirds of EV sales last year. Battery-powered EVs make up less than 3% of most auto makers’ fleets, which means they’d face an extremely steep ramp-up to hit the 2032 mandate. Even with Inflation Reduction Act subsidies, the Energy Information Administration forecasts that EVs will make up only 15% of sales in 2030.

That means auto makers will have to raise prices on gas-powered cars to offset losses on EVs they are required to make to meet government quotas. Ford lost $62,016 for every EV it sold in the third quarter. The only alternative is to buy regulatory credits from EV manufacturers. Tesla pocketed about $2,380 in credit sales for each car it sold in the U.S. during the first six months.
Democrats say the GOP legislation would “stifle innovation,” but car makers could continue to improve battery technologies. They merely wouldn’t be forced to lose money mass-producing EVs for consumers who don’t want them. Why can’t Democrats let producers meet the market demand for consumers?

As the facts about Mr. Biden’s EV mandate become better known, and the implications for consumers sink in, it is going to be an issue in 2024. If EVs were as popular as the climate lobby claims, the Administration wouldn’t have to mandate them, and Democrats wouldn’t be dissembling about what they’re doing.
Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
Appeared in the December 5, 2023, print edition as 'Congress Takes on the EV Mandate'.
 
US oil production has increased over the years while Biden has been office.
The talk of Biden against oil appears false.
The increase oil production has helped kept oil prices currently lower thus putting pressure on lower oil revenues for Russia.
 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top