The judge ruled the plaintiffs, Paul Austin and his wife, Tenisha Tate-Austin, failed show how their reliance on the alleged misrepresentation guided their decisions in seeking a mortgage based on …
www.marinij.com
Liza Cristol-Deman, a Bay Area attorney representing the Austins, said there are still
six claims pending. The Austins have contended that the appraisal violated the Fair Housing Act, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the California Unruh Act, which provides protection from discrimination, and the Unfair Competition Law.
“We disagree with the judge’s decision on the claim for negligent misrepresentation, but we are committed to pursuing our core claims of housing discrimination,” she said. “These claims remain in play.”
Liza is relentless with six claims after judge dismissed the negligent misrepresentation case back on 8/2022. No wonder Miller settled. The legal fees would have killed her (and it did with her daughter and husband).