TMG
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2007
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- California
It doesn’t sound like the lender is going to stop you.
...or pay you.
It doesn’t sound like the lender is going to stop you.
Yep, spot on, portfolios selling all around that asset. Unfortunately, I only had one MF left. I was thinking about taking 1031 from it, but it too small to rolling into something I don't love as a investment. So I decided I am just going to take the tax hit and concentrate on the appraisal, brokerage, and mediation business.I have done a number of properties in similar neighborhoods. None for gse. Sales are usually rare. Since these properties are cash cows and seldom sell. Like Russ said. Most sales take place between investors. Have seen property "swaps". Small bulk purchases etc. When I do have sales. They are all over the place and very seldom truly "compare" to subject. Sca becomes little more than an attachment. It is all about the income.
What would you consider "boardinghouse-style" rental arrangements. Part of HBU is being legally permissible. If it is ran as a boarding house and it is not legal. Then you have an issue. The properties I have appraised. Have leases in place that all signers of lease have joint and several responsibility. Do not know of any boarding house that would have that type of lease.Addressing the "boardinghouse-style" rental arrangements would be integral to your HBU analyis IMO although most of the AF does not agree.
The case law didn't seem to prohibit boarding house-style leases, did not seem to care if there was one lease or one lease for each room, etc. You can lease a garage to someone, a room to another, etc.What would you consider "boardinghouse-style" rental arrangements. Part of HBU is being legally permissible. If it is ran as a boarding house and it is not legal. Then you have an issue. The properties I have appraised. Have leases in place that all signers of lease have joint and several responsibility. Do not know of any boarding house that would have that type of lease.
The case you cited does not actually address boarding houses. It was more about net density. Not sure it could be successfully used in a case involving an actual boarding house.The case law didn't seem to prohibit boarding house-style leases, did not seem to care if there was one lease or one lease for each room, etc. You can lease a garage to someone, a room to another, etc.
Some zoning laws that remain on the books are unconstitutional and unenforceable. Some municipalities, particularly townships, have abandoned zoning regulations because the costs to administer a compliant program is too great and the cost to defend against poorly crafted zoning is significant. Plaintiffs (affected landowners) attorneys fees can be recouped in lawsuits.
"Legally" permissible is always an opinion. It seems that appraisal licensing should include more legal coursework.
Federal court finds Bowling Green housing ordinance to be unconstitutional
Federal court finds Bowling Green housing ordinance to be unconstitutionalwww.ohiorealtors.org
Interesting point, If less than 30 day occupant/lease, then there is some regulation that allows AirBnB and other uses in SFR by bedroom and levies a transient occupancy tax (hotel tax). If over 30 day lease, then is not subject to that tax. Other than that, doesn't seem the zoning has any application on the use as long as the number of persons is within the (case) law compared to number of bedrooms?The case you cited does not actually address boarding houses. It was more about net density. Not sure it could be successfully used in a case involving an actual boarding house.
The only situation I see would be zoning that restricts true boarding houses. Most of the SFR I have seen that have been converted to "boarding houses'. Have typically had every possible area turned into a bedroom. Might have a small common area and no kitchen facilities. Would be hard to convince anybody that it is just a SFR property with unrelated individuals living there.Interesting point, If less than 30 day occupant/lease, then there is some regulation that allows AirBnB and other uses in SFR by bedroom and levies a transient occupancy tax (hotel tax). If over 30 day lease, then is not subject to that tax. Other than that, doesn't seem the zoning has any application on the use as long as the number of persons is within the (case) law compared to number of bedrooms?
How do you see it, boarding, rooming, etc should all be ok now with that case as long as they comply with the other regulations related to whatever occupant license or lease term they are catering to?
Now I know why back in the day the Chief appraisers at the Banks and S & L did not allow us to check anything but the YES box under H & B use. Give some residential appraisers a foot of rope and they will hang themselfs. No matter what a single family home is being used for its legally permitted use and its zoning control its highest and best use. It may generate money as a grow house, a swingers club, a meth lab, many things but its income and use must be legal. If I tear down my house and what Uncle Billy calls his small Casita I now just have a vacant unimproved lot zoned CR-1 which allows one single family and a permitted guest unit and it's zoned 3 to 4 dwelling units ( homes ) per acre. The Zoning and Permitted Land almost always controls a properties H & B use.Addressing the "boardinghouse-style" rental arrangements would be integral to your HBU analyis IMO although most of the AF does not agree.