hastalavista
Elite Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2005
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- California
I do think this product does have a place, and may be great for certain appraisers. My main concerns have been price and where is it all heading?
If this trend does continue to gain market share, I have to wonder if the notion of geographic competence will start getting 'ignored'. Why rely on an appraiser actually IN that market? If one or two entities control all data access, that access could be given to their employees...er I mean independent contractors, to do appraisals nationwide. I've said this before, but the very core of this industry is getting chipped away. If the pieces are small enough, no one gets upset enough to fight back. Lets hope we are not like the frog being cooked in a pot of water--if you raise the temperature slowly enough, he will not jump out, and instead will simply boil to death.
Market competency (geographic) is a legitimate concern. And, yes, I think there is the possibility of putting together a team of appraisers in one area who will appraise in markets they've never personally visited. Do I think they can become "geo-competent" (knowledgable of the market) to complete an appraisal consistent with its SOW, intended use, and expectations? I do. But I don't see how that is cost-effective vs. using existing appraisers who are already in-place in those markets, who have the data, who need no runway to learn anything new (other than the appraisal reporting process). In the large, metropolitan areas (LA, New York, Chicago, Dallas, fill-in-the-blank-here) it might make sense to create a core-team therein. For everyplace else, it doesn't make any sense.
The "chipping away" is a legitimate concern (obviously). George Hatch says it better than I can ever say it: That chipping away is concentrated in the mortgage finance segment of our markets and is due to those users (and their regulators) believing that a sufficiently reliable alternative to an appraisal exists without any significant additional risk.
If our argument against the shrinking mortgage-finance volume is reduced to a turf-war argument, we will lose. The only way to win that argument is to demonstrate (or persuade/convince the powers that be) that all the other appraisal-alternatives are not appropriate for a transaction-type. We actually win that argument. Where we lose is when we try to apply it to all transaction-types.
That's how I see it.