<span style='color:darkblue'>Ben,
Good thoughts. I thoroughly agree to a minimal extent. However, I take considerable exception to a piece of unwarranted, obvious bias you've expressed in this thread:
"I don't like being a 'squid' "
There's nothing wrong with being a squid.
___________________
Austin,
Correction:
According to innumerable rigorous scientific studies funded by NIH, NAR (national), Mattel®, and several others, which are conducted regularly at all the nation's most prestigious research institutions and universities (except one), "Womens' Intuition" is now well understood to be a certain "inner voice" that lets women know when they are right -- regardless of whether they are or not.
(Extensive literary citations and references omitted here)
_________________
Slacker,
In your extensive listing of what informed buyers and sellers don't care about, you mentioned the following:
Beta Probabilities, Binomial Distributions, Chi-Squared Distributions, Confidence Intervals, Covariance's, Sum of Squares, F Probabilities, Fisher Transformations, Gamma Distributions, Kurtosis, T-tests, Z-tests, and last but not least the Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient “R”.
I agree. Your average, typical buyers and sellers, when running these and the other more sophisticated statistical models amongst themselves, often overlook such essentials as accepted rounding conventions for intermediate formula indications -- they just don't care. However, F Probabilities may not be discounted to the degree you may be indicating. Many or most transaction participants constantly monitor their own getting F'ed probabilities.
Hey, you wouldn't be interested in trading that handle would you?
dcj</span>