- Joined
- May 2, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- Arkansas
I don't follow your logic. My point is technology reacts to costs of labor. When possible the employer substitutes expensive labor with labor savings devices. Where does the hybrid make such savings? So far it hasn't proven it can? It has divided labor but the savings is not readily apparent...in fact, may be unlikely.Your baler posts are akin to DTB saying the introduction of hybrid appraisals impacted his appraisal business....
And then having DTB later say he got out of the appraisal business 5 years before hybrid appraisals were introduced to the industry....
Appraisers have done an incredible job of embracing technology. I've seen hand written green forms, typed, and struggled with laser printers that shelled out a whole two pages per minute, and fees when I started were $300, went to $325 in the late 90s, a fee that stayed stagnate for 15 yr. But we've reached a practical limit. Only incremental increases in production are available. We can work at computer speed only by using the joke called "artificial intelligence" which removes real heuristic judgment. AI is machine learning, nothing more, as Forbes recently noted,
The point, as various experts explain in my article, is to understand what A.I. can do—discrete tasks its designers have trained it to learn to do—and what it can’t, just about anything that requires the human qualities of nuance, empathy, or wisdom.
The Bakken experience indicated menu items increased 40% but the restaurant also mechanized with kiosk ordering and reducing staff which cut labor costs. Likewise (as I pointed out) they closed the dining room. No tables to bus, no floors to mop. They cut labor.
Last edited: