Greenback
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
- Professional Status
- Appraiser Trainee
- State
- Louisiana
Good question.
Simple answer: There is no logical reason to equate 60 years life expectancy to the home.
What about the quality of construction? Monolothic slabs vs' new technology, etc..?
Would location and path of progress assist in a logical reason to apply a higher expectancy life than 60 years old, compared with inferior locations and migration, with same actual ages (even similar) that have withstood time, say 60 years?