Randolph Kinney
Elite Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2005
- Professional Status
- Retired Appraiser
- State
- North Carolina
Except that is not the process. The carbon dioxide along with sunlight is fed to the organism which then secretes diesel fuel. Much like they do with diesel fuel from petroleum to mark fuel for certain uses, a die could be added to the fuel secreted by the organisms. It could be the supplier of waste carbon dioxide gets credit for not emitting the gas supplied for the process. Many possibilities exist.
The bottom line is the technology is unlike any other with the potential to greatly reduce the use of petroleum in a very short timeframe yet it requires no adaptation by end users.
I believe the environmentalist declare alcohol made from corn as a green fuel. Why? Because the corn gots its carbon from the atmosphere (not counting the fossil fuel used to grow it, harvest it or convert it to alcohol). So any plant life that gets its carbon from the ocean or from the atmosphere is producing a green fuel when it is converted to a hydrocarbon and burnt (combusted).
Never mind that petroleum and natural gas came from algae on the bottom of the Gulf. It's dirty carbon made by nature without man's assit.
When hydrocarbons are combusted, they produce carbon dioxide and water as their main products, regardless of how they are made or where they came from.
It is really stupid to claim one as a green source and the other a dirty source, since they can use the same carbon atom interchangeably. Both end up as emissions in the atmosphere. One causes global warming, the other doesn't.