- Joined
- May 20, 2011
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- Minnesota
I work for a lender and know the difference between the various products. I’ve seen data collectors produce PDCs for $25 in Palm Beach County. The AMC earned $175. I can post receipts, but then it’ll just be dismissed as not typical, which maybe it isn’t. But the sole reason appraisers aren’t getting PDCs is because AMCs make more using uber drivers.We tested property data collection for seven years. We tested it with appraisers, insurance inspectors, realtors, and several other workforces. We observed similar results across all workforces. That is because of the standardized, objective nature of the data standard, and also a testament to the intuitive technology that is used to collect the data. We have received over 350,000 PDC’s to date, and we have compared that data to data we see in appraisals on the same properties. By every objective measure we have, it compares very favorably. Additionally, we have received over 250,000 hybrid appraisals that used a PDC. We have compared those appraisals to traditional appraisals on the same properties and again, they compare very favorably. If you have not seen what a PDC looks like, I encourage you to look at one. It’s more comprehensive than any inspection I ever did as an appraiser. While we do not control what vendors charge or pay, I am not aware of anyone paying $25 for a GSE Uniform Property Dataset. Make sure you are not confusing it with lesser scope data collections or inspections typically used for servicing scenarios.
I am sure your testing showed no significant difference between appraiser PDC and uber-driver PDC. Did you publish it? I also would bet that the AMCs you partnered with during the pilot were losing money QCing all their files to ensure that outcome. Whether you get quality at scale is another question.