Hot off alamode press, maybe not exactly ready.

[jay trotta]

truefoot must be desperate if they are emailing me...not a chance even with a gun pointed at my head

no worries, when they find out your only 12 - they'll stop...........

 

[J Grant]

AI Overview

The dynamic format in the new UAD 3.6 cannot be cloned on a template because it is a data-driven system, not a static, form-based one
. Unlike the old UAD 2.6 forms, which were fixed templates, the 3.6 format dynamically adapts based on the specific property and appraisal data entered.
Key reasons why the dynamic format cannot be cloned:

• Data-driven report structure: The UAD 3.6 uses a single, flexible report that is built from the ground up using granular, standardized data fields. The layout, sections, and required fields are generated dynamically based on the property characteristics and scope of work. You cannot simply copy a static, pre-filled form since the report itself is not a template.
• This means the concept of a fixed "template" is no longer relevant.

Implications for appraisers
This shift fundamentally changes the appraisal workflow. Instead of loading a pre-filled template, appraisers will need to:

• Start with a blank dynamic report: The new workflow involves opening the single dynamic URAR and entering property data from scratch. The software then generates the correct report structure based on the data provided.
• Rely on software logic: Appraisal software, such as ACI or a la mode, now includes the dynamic logic to build the report as you input data. This process replaces the old "template" concept with a more automated, intelligent system.
• Adapt workflows: Instead of cloning old forms, appraisers will need to adjust their procedures to the new data-entry methodology. Software providers are offering training and webinars to help with the transition.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

 

[J Grant]

Above AI lookup this morning confirmed the UAD 3.6 dynamic format can not be cloned ( or merged) into or from a template. That was my point - I used the verbiage cloud-based, which was not technically correct, but my point was that each report starts new ( similar to cloud-based/web-based) . Alamdode said there is some kind of workaround possible (I imagine they are frantically working on it). I don't know what mystery provider offers a solution, but I doubt they can, when the largest, most tech-advanced appraisal form and software company owned by deep-pocket founder CoreLogic can not achieve it.

I used the word cloud incorrectly, but my point was that starting each order from scratch is a burden that will add significant time to reports. I imagine this is why ALAMODE, the most deep pocket and advanced sofware commpany needs more time for their rollout - they are trying to come up with a workable solution.

I assume data mill companies like True Footage will try to beat out the competition by a solution of autopopulating fields from their data or system, and are hiring staff who they will train in that manner. Which imo removes us further from appraising and into AVM let the software do it territory. Imo, an "appraiser" who never saw the subject property (if a PDC collector went out or if it is a desktop) and merely checks what the software did and if they agreed with the auto-populated data and adjustments is not appraising. Anyone can sit at a desk and look at photos or be monkey trained with a checklist to review auto-populated data, which I suppose is the point ( at taht point replacing the appraiser with an "analyst" - non-appraiser) .

What makes an appraiser have a valuable added skill set is the accumulated experience from time spent out in the field learning firsthand about the market and areas, talking to participants while at properties, seeing property qualities and defects firsthand, and not just looking at a photo. It involves working through analyzing the data, not just reviewing an autopopulated field of data.

(Note- the AI overview I looked up had a lot more technical information about why a report can not be cloned, but it was too long to save in the post. A asked AI why the new UAD 3.6 format can not be cloned and it answered.

 

[Terrel L. Shields]

There is no way there are dumbass appraisers out there that would fall for this stupidity....I think.

I'd hate to bet money on that.

 

[J Grant]

Since the thread topic was ALAMODE-

I am not familair with any of the new start ups or other software companies that are apparnatly offering UAD3.6 format to appraisers. I might look up a few when I have time-.

If one of the competing offers a truly superior UAD 3.6 solution, and especially if it is pay-per-use, I might try them. But my loyalty to ALAMODE is based on their long track record and that they are a legit company where you can reach someone by phone, talk to them, and they will walk you through a problem. Several months ago, when I tried True Footage for their daa, NO ONE would ever be available by phone, and they failed to address anything in their chatbot or whatever they substituted for actual tech support. ALAMODe offers spark with integrated with True Footage for a monthly fee of course to True Footage. Maybe it is worth the additional expense- or not. IDK.

A new software company or a struggling one might shut down overnight and leave one stranded. They do no have the $ (or care enough) to offer live tech support- it is more risky going with them.

Those of us who use ALAMODE or other existing software are on a one year substin and already paid for it plus we might still need tehir forms for non lender work or to access reports aht might need future revsin or reference.
I know the changeover is costing me a lot of $ , a new, more powerful computer, planning on a mobile device, and a lot of time in the learning curve. With the outlook for the field so uncetain I wonder if the payoff is worth it - for now am sticking with it.

 

[DWiley]

Above AI lookup this morning confirmed the UAD 3.6 dynamic format can not be cloned ( or merged) into or from a template.

As I noted before, I am testing one now (and will be testing another next week). When I hit "save as" it asks me if I want to save it as a template. I tried it, and it worked fine.

 

[Fernando]

AI Overview

The dynamic format in the new UAD 3.6 cannot be cloned on a template because it is a data-driven system, not a static, form-based one
. Unlike the old UAD 2.6 forms, which were fixed templates, the 3.6 format dynamically adapts based on the specific property and appraisal data entered.
Key reasons why the dynamic format cannot be cloned:

• Data-driven report structure: The UAD 3.6 uses a single, flexible report that is built from the ground up using granular, standardized data fields. The layout, sections, and required fields are generated dynamically based on the property characteristics and scope of work. You cannot simply copy a static, pre-filled form since the report itself is not a template.
• This means the concept of a fixed "template" is no longer relevant.

Implications for appraisers
This shift fundamentally changes the appraisal workflow. Instead of loading a pre-filled template, appraisers will need to:

• Start with a blank dynamic report: The new workflow involves opening the single dynamic URAR and entering property data from scratch. The software then generates the correct report structure based on the data provided.
• Rely on software logic: Appraisal software, such as ACI or a la mode, now includes the dynamic logic to build the report as you input data. This process replaces the old "template" concept with a more automated, intelligent system.
• Adapt workflows: Instead of cloning old forms, appraisers will need to adjust their procedures to the new data-entry methodology. Software providers are offering training and webinars to help with the transition.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Thanks for the insight. I always clone my reports with merging features. It saves time.
New form as I predicted will take more time to complete at Appraiser's expense.

 

[J Grant]

As I noted before, I am testing one now (and will be testing another next week). When I hit "save as" it asks me if I want to save it as a template. I tried it, and it worked fine.

Sounds promising!
Are you able to tell us the name of the software company?

After you save it as a template, can you open it as a new report (or merge or clone a new report into that template?

I believe ALAMODE might be developing something similar - I am keeping fingers crossed

 

[DWiley]

...asked AI why the new UAD 3.6 format can not be cloned and it answered.

This may be part of the reason you got the response that you got. You did not ask if it was possible. You asked why it was not possible. The prompt definitely affects AI results.

 

[Dublin ohio]

This may be part of the reason you got the response that you got. You did not ask if it was possible. You asked why it was not possible. The prompt definitely affects AI results.

You get the answer to the question you ask