Do I get to go first?
Oh boy. Here we go.
Credible:
Adj. Cred-uh-bull
def: referring to results communicated within an appriasal which are:
Able to be understood by the intedned user(s) of the report, clear in its summation, verifiable so that it can withstand scrutiny, employing methodology that is accepted in this and other industries, by which a valid conclusion about a property can be drawn by the reader for his/her stated use of said appraisal results, subject to the agreed upon scope of work.
Now, that being said, some of the preceeding statements really mean nothing. We have not identified any authority, or source, or body of knowledge to make most of them meaningful. What book should we refer to for our methodology? Edition 27 or Volume 3? Henry Harrison or someone else.
Words have meanings. We need to fill the void in the underlying meanings of such words as accepted methodology, verifiable(to what extent) etc...
Otherwise, it is just another vacuous and vague statement fit only for print in USPAP.
That's about all it means to me.
What say you, Oh Forum?