Doug Meyer
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2003
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Indiana
Joyce,
Is there ever a time when you will not mischaracterize something I said?
Everything Pam has IS hearsay- unless and until it is deemed to be fact in a court of law. The only FACT we know- still- is that they added their watermark to reports since they admitted that under oath.
Whatever additional stuff Pam has cannot be disclosed yet as she herself has said.
And what I have said is that I will not believe anything just because someone else happens to say so- I need to see the proof. I have also said that if her allegations were true they would probably go under because of it as no legitimate client would want appraisals that were altered in a material way (and I do not believe adding a watermark is a material alteration).
Finally, I wonder what this has to do with altering reports? Unless that is a component of that, the most likely thing to occur if Pam's lawyers try to incorporate this is that the judge will make them prove the relevancy.
I'll add another post later so that you all can actually think this stuff through since we still have to remember who this fellow is.
Brad
Sorry Brad I totally disagree with you!! A watermark IS altering a report. No if ands or buts!!
Last edited: