I have to question how the appraiser came to a commercial HBU. Can't imagine that the typical buyer is looking for a true commercial use property in an area as rural as that. Plumber, hvac, electrician. That is even common in my area. But for the most part. When the business leaves the building. What you have left is a nice outbuilding with a couple of room used for offices. Would seem to me that most of the typical commercial demand would be in or close to Timberville or Broadway. Typical in my area for small rural towns.The appraiser did the HBU, he didn’t just turn it down with no context - would that qualify enough for getting paid for the appraisal?
From the listing I posted. It has the newer 30 x 50 building a 40 x 60 indoor arena and a relatively small horse barn. Part of which is a lean to. Maybe 5000- 6000 sf of outbuilding in all. Why do I suspect the appraiser just looked at what the 30 x 50 building was being used for and flew with thatMr. Goodwin,
What I'm not understanding is what comparables the appraiser used. Are the comps similar farm-style properties that have similar HBU as 'commercial.'
From the photographs, you've got a lot of out buildings. When you made application did you disclose that there was a 3000 sf house and 15,000 sf of out buildings? What would be useful would be a pdf of the report. The properties I've done had small arenas, but usually not more than eight stalls. What did the prior owner use all those outbuildings for? It looks like the set-up is more complex than a SFR with a hobby arena.
I did indeed show the property to the lender beforehand.Mr. Goodwin,
What I'm not understanding is what comparables the appraiser used. Are the comps similar farm-style properties that have similar HBU as 'commercial.'
From the photographs, you've got a lot of out buildings. When you made application did you disclose that there was a 3000 sf house and 15,000 sf of out buildings? What would be useful would be a pdf of the report. The properties I've done had small arenas, but usually not more than eight stalls. What did the prior owner use all those outbuildings for? It looks like the set-up is more complex than a SFR with a hobby arena.
That’s my plan! Thus why I wrote here to get opinions - I wanted to be sure I wasn’t blinded by being the buyer who really wants the property. This has all been so helpful and I’ve already collated all this info and more and reached out to the AMC, the lender, broker, agents etc. And I’m planning on making noise until this get sorted out properlyThis type of assignment is certainly out of my wheelhouse and I don't have the competency to pull it off compared to where I am.
Having said that, did you voice your concern to the lender and selling agent, whom in turn could forward your concern to the AMC?
We as appraisers, especially from AMC's, get ROV's (reconsideration of value) all the time.
Bi*ch, moan, complain, run your fingernails down the chalkboard, and don't stop until you get a satisfactory resolution. Tell the lender you want a local appraiser to review the AMC one. Tell them you want another appraisal, tell them the H&BU analysis was unclear and you want an explanation. Keep going and don't stop....the squeaky wheel gets oiled...
You would have no way of knowing this, but Terrell mostly appraises rural properties including working ranch operations in Arkansas and Missouri so he knows that end of it very well.Not to be argumentative, particularly because I’m asking for advice… but it does seem like you’re a vast outlier here. It appears that most if not all but you, here, share the feeling that this is not a commercial property, nor would the value of the commercial style building make up 50% of the value of the property.
Being objective, is it not possible that the original appraiser felt this was too complex from the outset, but happily took the $630 and essentially made up an excuse as to not delve further into a more complex report?
Maybe I’m missing something, but it seems the guy got paid to draw up that report, and he certainly did. He drew up one that let him off the hook yet retained his payment.
That seems every bit as likely as the opposite scenario you contend.