• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

"Quantifiable Market-Derived Methods" for adjustments required by FNMA/USPAP

I sure do miss the days when every thread did not turn into a political debate (usually filled with ad hominem).
You folks do realize that whichever side you are on, your posts are not going to change the views of the other side? Right?
 
I sure do miss the days when every thread did not turn into a political debate (usually filled with ad hominem).
You folks do realize that whichever side you are on, your posts are not going to change the views of the other side? Right?
I had this conversation with my son the other day. Don't discuss politics online. You ant going to change their minds and they ant going to change yours. In the end, it just makes more enemies and makes you bitter. I told him to get a hobby or get some overtime.

I said to stop watching the news and stay off forums for a month...your life will change, that he would have a better outlook and would be more positive...less hatred.



That being said, can we go back to bashing the GSEs, the big mortgage lenders and the AMCs LOL


They also purchased redfin.....

Not good...creating a dominant
 
Show me proof tat 20 million illegals are getting free health care.
They are not because of the 1BBB bill. But Schumer's bill, pg. 57 rolls back the provisions of One Big Beautiful Bill 100% that banned paying such health care benefits.
 
I suggest an appraisal with no adjustments and just wide range to pick your value. :) All agents and buyers care about is price per foot anyway.:mad2:
 
I suggest an appraisal with no adjustments and just wide range to pick your value. :) All agents and buyers care about is price per foot anyway.:mad2:
I use price per foot too if I can fit it in my narrative. So much tools appraisers can use to make a convincing report.
 
Hahaha, you are so f**ked...hahaha...
If my figures don't agree with the price trend and shown on the report, one way is to use the $/sf to justify my reasoning. It must work since no reviewer has questioned Fernando's narrative.
You can spin numbers. I should be a politician consultant manipulating statistics.
Is this what Trump considered as thinking 4th Dimensional?
 
They are not because of the 1BBB bill. But Schumer's bill, pg. 57 rolls back the provisions of One Big Beautiful Bill 100% that banned paying such health care benefits.
So you have no proof 20 million illegals are getting free health care, which at least you admit, but stated it as if it were fact, on the assumption that they will, because of p 57of a proposed bill- (allegedly) - this is the problem, when asked for proof and evidence, it is rarely there. The MAGA posts filled with lies, allegations and denial of fact or evidence on bulletin boards and chat rooms echo the same kind of lies, allegations and denial our POTUS makes, which is the scary part. There is usually some sliver of fact among the mess so they can point to it - such as here , P 57 of a bill ( assuming it is correct ) rolls back a provision of the BBB, - and so the smoke trail goes.
 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top