If you are asking, no that is not applicable. Is there something I said that triggered you to assume that?
Also, I would not judge someone if they did move onto something different, as long as it was in line with our prior agreements. It sounds like we are on the same page there that we expect people to diligently work to meet the agreed terms? At least when it comes to having prior agreements in some form or another written or otherwise.
Is there something I said that indicates being pissed off?
I am concerned for the overall sustainability of appraisal as a primary profession and am always interested in hearing about others experiences. Some people have said I am too optimistic in general.
I am to understand the appraisal business is your giving back as charity and the other business support your private jet travel?
I think that is really an interesting point. Coming from someone who would like to build/create a successful business in appraisal, but have many other options for business/career; I am trying to understand how you decided on your goals for each business and the reasoning on taking this tact with appraisal.
Is the reason you decided to treat the businesses differently because the appraisal business does not support the same level of professionalism and written agreements as your other businesses or some other reason?
How would you have built a successful home care business competing with business owners who treat it as a charitable consideration and have a highly successful primary business?
Gaslighting is a form of
psychological manipulation in which a person or a group covertly sows seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or group, making them question their own memory, perception, or judgment.
For instance in this last message, saying you might be crazy, the negative nancy, prior statement about predictable outcomes, and you all think you own your clients; that is just meant to sow seeds of doubt. If you have a question, that may be different. None of those character references are applicable to my situation.
"The term originates in the systematic psychological manipulation of a victim by her husband in Patrick Hamilton’s 1938 stage play Gas Light,[6] and the film adaptations released in 1940 and 1944.[7] In the story, the husband attempts to convince his wife and others that she is insane by manipulating small elements of their environment and insisting that she is mistaken, remembering things incorrectly, or delusional when she points out these changes."
What is particularly useful to counteract gaslighting is to get the person to place agreements into writing, photographs, or video. These facts can later be utilized to address attempts of manipulator to change the dynamics in order to gain control or advantage or counteract the manipulator's illusions (illusionary truth effect).
What would be a reason that an appraiser would think they "own" (taken to mean clients are overly dependant/submissive) a bank or other client when the client is free to use any other vendor after a one or two-week project is done?
Is it common in your area to think that a $3,000 or even a $20,000 project creates a dependant relationship with a party/client?