Greg -
I don't know where you are coming from half the time so I don't take some of your posts very seriously. I'm certain some of them were written in jest.
I'm CR - no big deal. Florida has about 70 Licensed appraisers and they don't issue the Licensed ticket here. So this legislation don't mean squat to Florida appraisers. One might argue - he does not have a dog in the fight. Not so. My comments have consistently addressed what I think is good for the profession.
The new AQB requirements amount to too little too late. But they are adequate. The AQB finally acted - now I'm happy. But in spite of those requirements, the Licensed level category remains an effective work-around. It needs to be eliminated - phased out.
The notion that ANYONE should be permitted to demonstrate only one year of OJ experience in appraising and then be allowed to practice unsupervised is absurd. There is no doubt in my mind that Licensed appraisers took the shortest path they could find to get out from under supervision. And they remained Licensed because they had no motivation to upgrade.
Why do residential appraisers in general, fail to recognize the relationship between the supply of appraisers and the fees we are paid for our services? Why do they gripe about low fees and abuse from AMCs in one sentence and then gripe about increasing barriers to entry in the next?
I'm tempted to conclude many of my peers are really in some other business; some other business where more appraisers is better because it increases their bottom line. I don't teach appraisal courses, or write appraisal software or sell E&O insurance or work for Marshall and Swift. I don't work for an AMC, or sell appraiser lists and my earnings are not tied to license renewal fees. More appraisers does not benefit me.
All appraisers need to wake up. Unless you are in one of the side-line appraisal occupations I mentioned above more appraisers is not better. When the demand for appraisers increases sharply in the short-run, appraisal fees and t-times are supposed to increase. If a license level is available that can be obtained in the short-run, fees and t-times will NOT increase.
Licensed appraisers, in particular, don't get it!!! They have thousands and thousands of Trainee appraisers behind them waiting to get in the door. Those Trainees have entered the field on the assumption that they can continue to avoid the AQB's new requirements for Certification by earning the License level appraisal license.
Those Trainees have gambled, just like many Licensed appraisers have gambled, that their respective states would NEVER eliminate the Licensed category. Except they didn't count on federal legislation doing it.
Licensed appraisers!!! Rush for the door - I'm sorry you have to run. I sincerely hope you make it. I have no doubt many of you will, and that is as it should be. Once you get in, help close the door behind you.
No legislation has been proposed or enacted that prevents the career-minded individual from entering the appraisal field and easily becoming Certified in 2-5 years. But you probably can't do it in 1-2 years any longer.
I side with several of you on the issue of HUD giving Licensed appraisers who have demonstrated their competence the "quick" boot. Not fair!!! I confess I am inclined, in fairness, to give those appraisers 1 year to become Certified. But I would not support any Licensed appraiser being allowed to start the HUD roster application process after the date this legislation becomes effective. I do not want to see lawmakers trigger a rush from Trainee to Licensed and thereby attract more and more individuals with less than 2 years experience.