• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Short sale comparables?

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is my point. They are willing to accept amount short of is owned because they want to sell it fast. They know if they want to get the full amount, they never can sell it.

Believe me,no one is more anxious than banks to sell those properties which are sitting empty there and their money is tied down on them.

Like I said, every market is different. I can show you hundreds of EXPIRED short sales that never closed and ended up REO with 250+ DOM. They were all listed HIGH, and never closed. I can only speculate that the list price directly correlated with what was owed. Either the bank or the seller couldn't get it together fast enough, but for some reason, most don't sell. And because IT IS MORE HASSLE to get a Short through, there is enough inventory out there to avoid them. Even agents hate them, just ask a few.
 
Jim,
I wonder from where did you get the idea that it takes a long time for short sales and REOs to close? I have recently appraised many REOs and short sale properties and as soon as I delivered those appraisal reports, they were listed within a week and they went in to pending and after one or two weeks were closed. I think short sales with right asking prices take shorter time to sell. After all that is why the call them short sale. They sell them short because they want to sell them fast.

Moh a short sale is short for three reasons: 1. the sale price cannot cover the amount owed; 2. the owner does not have enough assets to cover the difference; 3. the bank determines it is in their economic best interest to sell the house as a short sale then to take full possession of it for foreclosure. The reason it takes a long time to close from date of contract to the closing date is because 1. the bank wants to be sure the house is worth what it is selling for and that they aren't falling victim to a scam; 2. the bank wants to analyze the owner's portfolio, bank accounts, 401Ks, cars they can sell, assets they have, and other options to see if the owners can cover the difference without the bank taking a loss; 3. there may be a second lien holder involved where the first lien holder has priority and will gain all of their money, but the secondary lender will lose out, making them apprehensive to agree. They have as much right to reject the short sale as the primary lender. A friend of the family almost sold their house in a short sale, $90,000 under. The bank took 3 months to get back to them and refused the sale saying after investigating what they had and what they need, it was within their ability to rent their house out and then rent a smaller house where they were moving to for less, using the difference to cover the mortgage. That's how detailed they got. The buyer is suing our friends, the REALTOR and anyone else he can - he's a lawyer.

A short sale is not called a short sale because it has a short amount of exposure, or a short time from list date to close date. That would be a quick sale. Talking time from contract to close there is nothing quick about. The appraisal for a short sale under contract typically will not be ordered until the bank approves it. There are agents are now trying to get a price pre-approved by a bank by having an appraisal done up front. But there is still the other paperwork, second opinion appraisals, BPOs, secondary lenders, and asset investigation to be done, so at best the approval process for a particular price is in process when an offer at that price comes in.

Yes, if the short sale or REO is limited to just one neighborhood, you should check other neighborhood similar to your neighborhood but the short sale is not limited to my neighborhood. Plus if the cause of short sale is limited to one neighborhood, then you ought to be very careful to find a neighborhood identical you yours in everything which is very hard and sometime impossible to find.

Actually the opposite might be true. If foreclosures and REOs are limited to just one project there may be something wrong with that project. It could be a sink hole problem (actual problem I dealt with), a contractual problem where the builder sold with a no sale except through the builder clause for X number of years (another actual example), it could be a toxic waste issue (Hey, I'm originally an appraiser from Jersey), it could be one investor bought 50 houses and went belly up (another one I was involved with). If you are in the only neighborhood with foreclosures that's a good sign there is something wrong in that project. If on the other hand foreclosures are common throughout your competitive market area and your project has not had any private sales for what could be an arbitrary reason (luck of the draw) going into other projects would be the right thing to consider.

Sometimes, the cause of short mass short sale is due to special situation of a particular neighborhood, which could be very unique. For example, the builder sold all of those homes with very toxic loans 3 years ago and all the sudden they are all unfolding. Other surrounding neighborhood don’t have such a situation and doing better or get less short sales. Now, if you select a sale from other subdivision to use for the value of home in a subdivision, which is tainted by bad loans, you are valuing for a different location if you believe on the effect of location and neighborhood on the market value.

Exactly my point from above where you argued the opposite. But when you have neighborhoods all around with short sales and foreclosures you don't really have the unique situation you are describing.

By the way, I have already checked the other subdivisions very carefully.
The problem with my subdivision is that it contains attached single family homes. There is only one subdivision within one mile with similar homes. It has only one close sale that I am using it. The other subdivisions are either detached with different designs, association fees and market appeals or condos designated for income poeple. other attached home subdivisions are in the golf course within 1.5 miles distance.

Distance doesn't matter, what matters is where the typical buyer for an attached house in this market will shop for competitive properties. Typically there are always a couple of competitive projects within a 5 or 10 mile radius sharing the same or highly competitive amenities, because single builder PUD projects need competitors to close the first few units. To show outside, competitive sales I have gone miles and miles away. The operative word is "competitive" neighborhoods not "distance". You said you have one private sale in your project from months ago. Do you have REO sales from that same period? If so, did they sell for the same or for less?

I referred to emotion because you mentioned the effect of buyer’s emotion on bank influenced and non-bank influenced sales. I think that is a moot opinion. There is no such an emotional attachment. You are psychoanalyzing the buyer instead of analyzing the market and the sales.

Wrong. The buyers and sellers are the market. I have to read the market (the buyers and sellers) and do my best to see what they are reacting to. It is unavoidable. When you say buyers are "capitalist homebuyers" you are giving your own psychological profile. The question is, Which one is right? If your's is correct than we would never see a measurable difference between a well marketed REO or short sale in average condition when it is compared to an equally marketed non-REO/short sale in similar condition. But the difference is there. You've noticed it and admitted it when you said the REOs and short sales lead the way in a declining market. But when REOs start selling for $125,000 after the non-REO sales were selling for $150,000, the other sales might not drop all the way to $125,000. They might sell for $130,000 or $135,000 or higher. I can pull up development after development that shows that over and over again. And now, like the example I showed in one of my other posts above, I am seeing houses sell considerably higher than what the REOs were selling for.
 
Last edited:
In addition, it's usually the owner who decides they want to try and sale the house before they foreclose, not the bank. Usually in a Short, the owner gets an agent to list the house and negotiate with the bank directly. This is one of the reasons they are not as desirable, they are more work. You can usually tell by the MLS if the bank is on board yet, "Priced approved by the bank!" or, "Bank is quick to respond on offers". I've talked with countless agents who have said, the bank takes 2 weeks to respond to an offer, these are usually the listings that dont mention communication with the bank, and end up foreclosing. When you call the agents, try to find out if the bank is going to 1099 the owner. I've done a couple Shorts for the bank where the bank didn't want me to know the purchase price. It was to be approached as a REFI to insure my value wasn't influenced by the PP. They were going to 1099 the seller (referred to as "borrower" in report) the diff. I hate doing those because all I see liability in the future when the guy gets his 1099 at the end of the year and the house is worth another 30% less than as of my Eff Date...and I'll be explaining ED to an attorney. Hopefully not.
 
A 1099 can be filed after a foreclosure too. A lot of the better players don't do it, but the creepy ones (and we all know who I mean) do. They see it as good business. Others view it as an extention of predatory lending.
 
What's short about a property that has been on the market for 90, 120, 200+ days?

I define a short sale as a truly distressed, under current market value offering that should sell immediately, if not sooner.

And don't get me started about these 3rd party approvals either.
 
The definition of "Short Sale" is on the list.

http://www.homeassure.com/glossary.htm

You can certainly call any sale where the value of the house does not meet the amount of the mortage a short sale (I've never heard a sale contracted at a price below market value called a short sale though). However, it is not typical to advertise in the MLS as such, unless what they mean by Short Sale is how it is defined in this list.

If my house is worth $400,000 and I owe $500,000 but I have the money to cover the difference, then there is no need to be advertising that in the MLS. It really isn't the buyer's, bank's or even agent's business.
 
Last edited:
Distance doesn't matter, what matters is where the typical buyer for an attached house in this market will shop for competitive properties. Typically there are always a couple of competitive projects within a 5 or 10 mile radius sharing the same or highly competitive amenities, because single builder PUD projects need competitors to close the first few units. To show outside, competitive sales I have gone miles and miles away. The operative word is "competitive" neighborhoods not "distance". You said you have one private sale in your project from months ago. Do you have REO sales from that same period? If so, did they sell for the same or for less?
Jim,
I have one private sale in the project sold on 2/28/08 for $862,500 and one REO sale sold on 12/28/2007 for $942,500. How do you account for this? Does it say anything to you or to me? The private sale sold 8% lower than REO sale within 2 months. Go figure.
I have one listing at $899,000 with DOM of 235 days but the other 8 are listed between $772,000 to $799,000 with DOM between 3 to 130 days. All of them are short sales but one which is an REO and a pending.

Now, if this project is bombarded by those overwhelming short sales listings for any reason and a homeowner is looking for the current market value of her home which is similar to those 9 listing, why shouldn't they represent the market value for that home? You are saying that they are not indicative of my subject market value because the mortgage holders of those homes are willing to take the loss and let the homeowners to sell those homes at their current listing prices.

If I understand you correctly, you are suggesting that I should go any distance to find similar projects and find the ratio of non short sales to short sales and apply it to short sales listings or sales in my subject project and based on that you think I can get the market value for my subject. Is that what you are suggesting or you have a different theory that I haven’t gotten it?

If that is what you are suggesting, then I think it might not work because the severity of short sales are different in each project for any reason. One project may have 200 homes and 2 short sales, which are going to be different from my project, which has 102 homes with 9 short sales.

Secondly, the differences between projects are not only attached/detached but the size, the age, the amenities and for that reason, the short sale effect or default might be different in each project that could cause a misleading results.
 
Jim,
I have one private sale in the project sold on 2/28/08 for $862,500 and one REO sale sold on 12/28/2007 for $942,500. How do you account for this?

I don't know your market well enough, nor do I have the MLS and access to the agents to find out about differences in quality. But in my market I can account for that difference and then some by a decline in the market first and foremost. I have my MLS data below, note the drop from December 2007 to February of 2008. I believe it is over 11%.

Now, if this project is bombarded by those overwhelming short sales listings for any reason and a homeowner is looking for the current market value of her home which is similar to those 9 listing, why shouldn't they represent the market value for that home? You are saying that they are not indicative of my subject market value because the mortgage holders of those homes are willing to take the loss and let the homeowners to sell those homes at their current listing prices.

I'm not saying they shouldn't, just that they might not. Now mind you I am not defining "Short Sale" the way Joyce does. I mean by short sale what is common venacular among agents who advertise short sales. For me, when I think short sale, it is a sale that requires lender approval. Like I asked before, If you have the opportunity to buy the subject at $800,000 or buy a short sale that needs lender approval that is otherwise identical for the same amount, which would you buy? I think any prudent buyer, given all other things are equal, will pick the market sale because there is no waiting for bank approval. How much is that wait worth? I don't know. It might be nothing, it might be a lot. I go to the market to at least make my best effort to find out.

If I understand you correctly, you are suggesting that I should go any distance to find similar projects and find the ratio of non short sales to short sales and apply it to short sales listings or sales in my subject project and based on that you think I can get the market value for my subject. Is that what you are suggesting or you have a different theory that I haven’t gotten it?

Kind of right. Any distance as long as you are staying in the competitive market. If you don't have anything and you cannot support an adjustment, or determine a market reaction, that does not preclude you from noting your efforts to find one. If you market is like mine in that it dropped like a stone from December to February, say that same 11%, you might have enough to support a 3% adjustment for the stigma of ownership (considering your drop in that unit was only 8%). It isn't easy to figure out, and I am not trying to make it sound like it is. But you at least have to make effort and if you find adjustments are not measurable due to the variables at this time, then state so in the report.

If that is what you are suggesting, then I think it might not work because the severity of short sales are different in each project for any reason. One project may have 200 homes and 2 short sales, which are going to be different from my project, which has 102 homes with 9 short sales.

What does Greg's tagline say..."Sometimes I hate appraising". Ditto.

Secondly, the differences between projects are not only attached/detached but the size, the age, the amenities and for that reason, the short sale effect or default might be different in each project that could cause a misleading results.

You do have to try for the most competitive project. Typically there is something that you find that brings it all together. If you uncover depreciation rates in your market by more than 8% you may have already found a piece to the puzzle. But in the those rare instances where there is nothing, deciding to make no adjustment is still a choice, and because the bank influence can have an effect on value, you should state why you did not make an adjustment. Just like if you have an amenity like a shed or fence that doesn't have a measurable value, you should at least comment on it in the report.
 

Attachments

The definition of "Short Sale" is on the list.

http://www.homeassure.com/glossary.htm

You can certainly call any sale where the value of the house does not meet the amount of the mortage a short sale (I've never heard a sale contracted at a price below market value called a short sale though). However, it is not typical to advertise in the MLS as such, unless what they mean by Short Sale is how it is defined in this list.

If my house is worth $400,000 and I owe $500,000 but I have the money to cover the difference, then there is no need to be advertising that in the MLS. It really isn't the buyer's, bank's or even agent's business.
Yes, of course the seller is willing to take the loss in order to prevent larger loss. The lender is willing to sell the home for less than the mortgage becaue it is in their own iterest to do so. That is why the short sale doesn't only mean that the lender is willing to sell the home for less than mortgage amount but it also means that the lender wants to sell it as soon as possible in order to stop the bleeding. The lender doesn't have to agree to the short sale and can let the home become a foreclosure and then an REO and then sit in their files for ever. That wouldn't be a sound decision. They are willing to sell it short in order to sell it fast. So short sale should always come with quick sale otherwise it is not a real short sale.
 
I am unsure what your last post meant, Moh. It was a bit of a non sequitor because my example was of a sale where the owner came up with the money to cover the difference, the bank did not forgive it.

The classic short sale (what agents mean by short sale) doesn't typically sell fast. They take a while. Like Eva said, call and ask some agents. I appraise short sales weekly and talk to agents about them nearly daily to determine their use as a comparable. Sometimes, just like Eva said, the process is faster. But it is not typical.

The reason the bank is not looking to stop the bleeding as you say is because it is common for the owner to continue paying the mortgage through the process. A lot of agents say "Stop paying and they'll come to a decision sooner". It is 50/50 advise because if they do stop paying and it goes past 3 months the foreclosure process can begin.

Short sales are not something the bank always prefers and they prefer if it is something not many people know about as an option because it can influence people towards what is perceived by the owners as an easier way out. A lot of people are now trying for a short sale with bank forgiveness even though they can make the mortgage payment or pay the difference, as they try to take advantage of the bank.

http://ezinearticles.com/?Short-Sal...-Sense-Of-The-Short-Sale-Definition&id=587722
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top