David W, in reply to a recent thread where you state, more or less, that I should not wish for Fannie & Freddie to be abolished as the would surely be my doom because I would not be able to compete. Well bad news. Seeing as how 95% of my work, give or take, is from local clients that lend their own money I do not believe I will lose any sleep over the matter. What is stopping them from using the local CGs 100% of the time now? I brought with me into this business a couple of cool tricks from two previous fields that opened some doors for me. Little something they don't teach at Princeton. Now, there are things I still cannot work on alone but I have someone that is both a friend and mentor to work with me on those and the rest goes to others. I still fill in the gaps (thanks govt) as a part time property claims adjuster (was previously full time) but don't really need it and usually do not have the time for it and turn some down here and there. I will just say that I make a good living and leave it at that. I know it's hard to believe that a non degreed individual is able to compete out there right? Imagine that. In actuality, my background is probably more suited for this work than yours and most definitely someone with any old degree. I'm sorry, you just really come off as a bit smug, prickish even. Unjustified, I am certain.
I am all for education. What I am not for is using it as a tool to monopolize an industry, whether I am in the loop or out, I believe in free competition. I am not worried about technology nor I am worried about competition. If am obsolete in the workforce then I will simply go back to what I was doing before or re-train for something else. I do not believe that I am. I am not your slap it together, stamp it and send it own its way appraiser. I am glad to know that you are concerned for me though. Very sweet.
What you fail to comprehend is that even though 80% of the millionaires are college educated, how many more of the non-degreed were left out by the monopoly on professional entry barriers and licensing. Also, something you didn't grasp in the last thread is where I stated, " What would American architecture be like if there wasn't a non degreed architect named Frank Loyd Wright?" You replied something along the lines of, he was the exception and no the rule or the usual something or another. Yes, this is true, in the current environment of the govt licensing monopoly but the question still remains, what would American architecture be like if a few govt bureaucrats decided that he couldn't practice his craft?