No, they said market theory suggests dollar for dollar is expected in undersupplied markets and by not adjusting appraisers are inflating appraised values.
I say let’s leave the decisions about how much to adjust in the hands of the professionals, instead of flip flopping based on the agenda for that day. Like every other adjustment, concessions adjustments should always be market-derived. Like every other adjustment, depending upon how it is derived the market will say different things.
Dollar for dollar is always going to be a safe and valid approach because it is rational, in the same way a cost based adjustment is safe and rational. Is it perfect? No. But it’s reasonable and supported via “market theory” or whatever.
Or you can do a regression and show that maybe the adjustment should be 50 cents on the dollar. Or maybe the regression shows little correlation for that coefficient, so no adjustment is needed.
Based on the similarity of the data you can do a sensitivity analysis and find what I’ve found many times, which is that the market does not recognize an adjustment, even when market theory suggests otherwise.
Basically depending on how you look at it, it is pretty easy to support anywhere from 0.00 to 1.00 on concessions, and the fighting about it is people disagreeing about their preferrences.